"to be appointed as" vs "for appointment of"

Question

"to be appointed as" vs "for appointment of"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'To be appointed as' is used when referring to someone being chosen for a specific position or role. 'For appointment of' is used when indicating the purpose or reason for appointing someone.

Last Updated: March 15, 2024

This phrase is used to indicate that someone is selected or designated for a particular job, position, or duty.

Examples:

He was appointed as the new CEO of the company.
She was appointed as the head of the department.
They were appointed as members of the committee.

Alternatives:

to serve as
to act as
to take on the role of
to assume the position of
to be designated as

This phrase is used to explain why someone is being appointed to a particular position or role.

Examples:

The committee met to discuss the candidates for appointment of the new manager.
The board is responsible for the appointment of the executive director.
The process for appointment of a new CEO is underway.

Alternatives:

for the selection of
for the designation of
for the assignment of
for the naming of
for the choosing of

Answer 1

to be appointed as

This phrase is correct and commonly used when referring to someone being chosen for a specific position or role.

Answer 2

for appointment of

This phrase is correct and is used to indicate the purpose or reason for appointing someone.

"to be appointed as" vs "for appointment of"

to be appointed as

for appointment of

Related Comparisons