Which is correct:
"to avoid redundancy, " or "as it has been explained in detailed "?

TextRanch: The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

100% Human-Powered Editing!

to avoid redundancy,

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to emphasize the importance of not repeating information unnecessarily.

This phrase is used to highlight the need to prevent unnecessary repetition in writing or speech.

Examples:

  • To avoid redundancy, I will not reiterate the same points.
  • We need to rephrase this sentence to avoid redundancy.
  • To avoid redundancy, let's summarize the key points briefly.
  • The editor removed the redundant information to avoid redundancy.
  • To avoid redundancy, use synonyms instead of repeating the same words.

as it has been explained in detailed

This phrase is incorrect. It should be "as it has been explained in detail" without the word "detailed."

The correct phrase is "as it has been explained in detail" to refer to a previous detailed explanation.

Alternatives:

  • as it has been explained in detail
  • as previously explained in detail
  • as detailed earlier
  • as elaborated upon previously
  • as thoroughly explained before
These two phrases are not directly comparable as they serve different purposes. "To avoid redundancy" is used to prevent unnecessary repetition, while "as it has been explained in detail" is used to refer back to a previous detailed explanation. They are not interchangeable in most contexts.

Last updated: March 17, 2024

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!