TextRanch
The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

TextRanch Editors

to appreciate who the authors are vs to appreciate whom the authors are

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'To appreciate who the authors are' is more commonly used in informal language, while 'to appreciate whom the authors are' is more formal. The choice between 'who' and 'whom' depends on the formality of the context.

Last updated: March 23, 2024 • 826 views

This phrase is correct and commonly used in informal language.

"to appreciate who the authors are"

This phrase is used in informal contexts when expressing appreciation for the identity of the authors.

Examples:

  • I want to appreciate who the authors are before I read the book.
  • It's important to appreciate who the authors are to understand the context of the story.
  • The authors appreciate the response of the Commission to Questions E-2278/06 and E-4492/06 on the question of discrimination taking place in blood donation centres.
  • This theme is stripped down to its barest graphical units and painted in black and white only. It is intended to help players who may be visually impaired. The author would appreciate email responses on how effective it is and what improvements in visibility could be made.
  • So... You know who The Author is.
  • Yesterday on TV they mentioned a book, I can't remember who the author was.
  • I think it would be worth finding out who the author of this compromising Eastern policy is.
  • He thought you might have a clue as to who The Author is so I can make him change that.
  • If you know who the authors of the server software are, submit the bug report directly to them.
  • Tomorrow Mr. Hartman will bring the letter... ...and from the handwriting it will be easy to find out who the author is.
  • If so, the authors are most likely in possession of my stolen laptop.
  • When this happens, we're not able to appreciate who they are.
  • The authors are expressly opposed to animals being patented, as that would be interference in creation.
  • As the authors are not present, Question Nos 44, 45 and 46 lapse.
  • I understand where the authors are coming from and I share their views.
  • As the authors are not present, Question Nos 6 and 7 lapse.
  • Questions Nos 73, 74 and 78 lapse, as the authors are not present.
  • As the authors are not present, Questions Nos 14, 15, 16 and 18 lapse.
  • However, the authors are not trying to do the work of historians.
  • As the authors are not present, Questions Nos 17, 18, 19, 20 and 21 lapse.
  • As the authors are not present, Questions Nos 32 and 33 lapse.
  • As the authors are not present, Questions Nos 12, 13 and 14 lapse.

Alternatives:

  • to appreciate the authors' identities
  • to appreciate the authors
  • to appreciate the authors' backgrounds
  • to appreciate the authors' contributions
  • to appreciate the authors' work

This phrase is correct and more commonly used in formal language.

"to appreciate whom the authors are"

This phrase is used in formal contexts when expressing appreciation for the identity of the authors.

Examples:

  • It is important to appreciate whom the authors are before making any judgments.
  • To truly appreciate whom the authors are, one must delve into their backgrounds.
  • The authors appreciate the response of the Commission to Questions E-2278/06 and E-4492/06 on the question of discrimination taking place in blood donation centres.
  • This theme is stripped down to its barest graphical units and painted in black and white only. It is intended to help players who may be visually impaired. The author would appreciate email responses on how effective it is and what improvements in visibility could be made.
  • If so, the authors are most likely in possession of my stolen laptop.
  • The authors are expressly opposed to animals being patented, as that would be interference in creation.
  • As the authors are not present, Question Nos 44, 45 and 46 lapse.
  • I understand where the authors are coming from and I share their views.
  • As the authors are not present, Question Nos 6 and 7 lapse.
  • Questions Nos 73, 74 and 78 lapse, as the authors are not present.
  • As the authors are not present, Questions Nos 14, 15, 16 and 18 lapse.
  • However, the authors are not trying to do the work of historians.
  • As the authors are not present, Questions Nos 17, 18, 19, 20 and 21 lapse.
  • As the authors are not present, Questions Nos 32 and 33 lapse.
  • As the authors are not present, Questions Nos 12, 13 and 14 lapse.
  • As the authors are not present, Questions Nos 46, 47 and 48 lapse.
  • As the authors are not present, Questions Nos 20 to 24 and 27 lapse.
  • Other parts of the & kdm; code are copyright by the authors, and licensed under the terms of the GNU; GPL. Anyone is allowed to change & kdm; and redistribute the result as long as the names of the authors are mentioned.
  • One has the impression that the authors are well acquainted with the problems and have analysed them well but that, as soon as it comes to combating them, they fail to penetrate beneath the surface.
  • We should appreciate that the resale right is actually a right of the author and not a tax, as the opponents would have it.
  • And finally that although the likely average costs of individual tests which have been collected and analysed by the authors are accurate, but as a consequence of the overstatement of the number of test required, the total testing costs are also overestimated.'
  • I greatly appreciate the efforts of the authors of the draft directive, that is, the Commission, to draw up and make more complete flood maps and indicative maps of flood-induced losses.

Alternatives:

  • to appreciate the authors' identities
  • to appreciate the authors
  • to appreciate the authors' backgrounds
  • to appreciate the authors' contributions
  • to appreciate the authors' work

Related Comparisons

How TextRanch works

Fast and reliable proofreading, editing, and language advice tailored to your needs.

1. Choose Your Service

Quick Text Editing

  • Emails and short texts
  • Proofreading & editing
  • Ready in 5-10 minutes
SUBMIT YOUR TEXT NOW

Document Editing

  • Documents of any type (*.docx)
  • Advanced & Premium editing
  • Ready in as little as 4 hours
UPLOAD YOUR DOCUMENT

Ask an Editor

  • Personalized answers to your language questions
  • Expert guidance on grammar, style, and usage
  • Ready in 24 hours
ASK YOUR QUESTION

Upload your document or paste your text directly into our platform. Your text is reviewed and refined by our expert editors (real people, not machines) who understand the nuances of English. Expect corrections, improvements, and insightful suggestions that enhance the clarity, tone, and professionalism of your writing.

In just a few minutes (or hours for longer documents), you'll receive your corrected text. Review the changes, make any final adjustments, and confidently share your polished English with the world.
You can count on a personalized, friendly service every time you use TextRanch. We're committed to helping you make a great impression with every word you write.

We proofread and edit these types of texts and documents:

Short texts Business Emails Personal Emails Social media posts Resume and Curriculum Vitae Business documents Sales proposal Research and academic papers Thesis Dissertation Essays Articles Blog posts and much more....

Powered By Humans

TextRanch Editors

AI is a great tool, but when it comes to perfecting your writing, we rely on real human editors.

  • All our editors are native English speakers.
  • Each editor has passed a rigorous admission test to ensure quality.
  • Our global team is ready to correct any text, anytime.

MEET OUR EDITORS

TextRanch Editors

Why choose TextRanch?

Complete Privacy

Your texts are safe and secure with us. We never share your information with third parties.

Affordable Pricing

No subscription fees and rates up to 50% cheaper than other online editing services.

100% Satisfaction

We guarantee that you'll be satisfied with the quality of our service or your money back.

Top Customer Service

Our team is here to help you with any questions you may have. Contact us anytime.

Our Customers Love Us!

We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283125 votes, and

People Feedback 4.9 Excellent - Reviews 2.137

"7 years without any disappointment. Always 100% satisfied. You guys are the best in the world at what you do. Thank you so much :)"

Profile picture of Zubair from Bangladesh

Zubair
from Bangladesh From

"I wasn't aware of this service, it's fascinating and more reliable than standard IA tools available on the internet"

Profile picture of Arturo from Mexico

Arturo
from Mexico From

"In a world of text messages and online communication, this is great to have as a live tool. Thank you."

Profile picture of Selena from USA

Selena
from USA From

"Wow, it's just so excellent. I never would have believed I could have a sure and excellent English companion. Thanks, TextRanch."

Profile picture of Ifiok from Nigeria

Ifiok
from Nigeria From

"This is my first time using TextRanch, and I like how the editors take time to correct my text. To everyone who has never used TextRanch before, I highly recommend trying it."

Profile picture of Wilson from France

Wilson
from France From

"It is an amazing source of feedback because, as a non-native speaker, I really need to have a reliable helper correct my text."

Profile picture of Susan from Germany

Susan
from Germany From

Trusted by Hundreds Teams

Facebook logo
Accenture logo
Air Asia logo
AirBus logo
Amazon logo
Bayer logo
Decathlon logo
Docusign logo
Ebay logo
Fiverr logo
Fossil logo
Keller Williams logo
LinkedIn logo
Loreal logo
Motorola logo
Orange logo
Roche logo
Salesforce logo
Stellantis logo