TextRanch
The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

TextRanch Editors

this is not what the company looked like vs this is not which the company looked like

The correct phrase is 'this is not what the company looked like.' The use of 'what' is appropriate when referring to the appearance or characteristics of something. 'Which' is not used in this context.

Last updated: March 30, 2024 • 584 views

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

"this is not what the company looked like"

This phrase is used to express that the current situation or appearance is different from what was expected or previously seen.
  • Lou's name being on the company looked pretty bad.
  • In other words, consumer rights and transfer capacity need to be regulated, and the dominant position of the big energy companies looked into.
  • In the 1980's the British private insurance company Equitable Life looked like a good place to set aside some money for retirement.
  • He said he worked for the phone company, but it looked like he was just taking a nap.
  • The company also looked at the way the combined tablet was absorbed in the body in comparison with the separate tablets.
  • The company also looked at the way the combined tablet was absorbed in the body in comparison with the separate medicines.
  • In a country in which the people in the south could be scourged by bombing for years on end and where Western oil companies looked after the interests of their shareholders while turning a blind eye to the victims of the slaughter?
  • The documentation shows that the company had looked at several alternatives before negotiating with RR, with the business plans for each alternative, both with and without the aid:
  • Looked like you could use the company.
  • However, the company had only looked at the development between 2009 and the RIP while for the assessment of injury the overall development of the Union industry during the period considered, i.e. between 2007 and the RIP needs to be assessed.
  • Finally, the Commission looked at company balance sheet statistics by sectors collected by the Central Banks of Germany, France, Italy, Japan and the USA.
  • And then for non-Idealab companies, I looked at wild successes, like Airbnb and Instagram and Uber and Youtube and LinkedIn.
  • That road company James Dean looked at you like you were a freshly baked cannoli.
  • The cost of inspection within the EU and fees charged to each feed company have to be looked at, because if one country is charging significantly more for inspections than another, it causes distortions throughout the single market.
  • When they diagnosed it, it said to me that it would understand... if I looked for company elsewhere.
  • No matter what the company give me.
  • That's what the company wants.
  • At least that's what the company does.
  • At least that's what the company does.
  • I use what the company buys.

This phrase is incorrect in English. 'Which' is not used to refer to the appearance or characteristics of something.

"this is not which the company looked like"

N/A
  • Lou's name being on the company looked pretty bad.
  • In other words, consumer rights and transfer capacity need to be regulated, and the dominant position of the big energy companies looked into.
  • In the 1980's the British private insurance company Equitable Life looked like a good place to set aside some money for retirement.
  • He said he worked for the phone company, but it looked like he was just taking a nap.
  • The company also looked at the way the combined tablet was absorbed in the body in comparison with the separate tablets.
  • The company also looked at the way the combined tablet was absorbed in the body in comparison with the separate medicines.
  • In a country in which the people in the south could be scourged by bombing for years on end and where Western oil companies looked after the interests of their shareholders while turning a blind eye to the victims of the slaughter?
  • The documentation shows that the company had looked at several alternatives before negotiating with RR, with the business plans for each alternative, both with and without the aid:
  • Looked like you could use the company.
  • However, the company had only looked at the development between 2009 and the RIP while for the assessment of injury the overall development of the Union industry during the period considered, i.e. between 2007 and the RIP needs to be assessed.
  • Finally, the Commission looked at company balance sheet statistics by sectors collected by the Central Banks of Germany, France, Italy, Japan and the USA.
  • And then for non-Idealab companies, I looked at wild successes, like Airbnb and Instagram and Uber and Youtube and LinkedIn.
  • That road company James Dean looked at you like you were a freshly baked cannoli.
  • There must be some directive which the companies are breaching.
  • The forecasts do not take account of the divestitures which the company will have to carry out.
  • The cost of inspection within the EU and fees charged to each feed company have to be looked at, because if one country is charging significantly more for inspections than another, it causes distortions throughout the single market.
  • When they diagnosed it, it said to me that it would understand... if I looked for company elsewhere.
  • the corporate governance code to which the company is subject, and/or
  • in exceptional and unforeseeable circumstances for which the company is not responsible.
  • It takes the form of a reduction in the tax to which the companies concerned would otherwise be liable.

Related Comparisons

How TextRanch works

Fast and reliable proofreading, editing, and language advice tailored to your needs.

1. Choose Your Service

Quick Text Editing

  • Emails and short texts
  • Proofreading & editing
  • Ready in 5-10 minutes
SUBMIT YOUR TEXT NOW

Document Editing

  • Documents of any type (*.docx)
  • Advanced & Premium editing
  • Ready in as little as 4 hours
UPLOAD YOUR DOCUMENT

Ask an Editor

  • Personalized answers to your language questions
  • Expert guidance on grammar, style, and usage
  • Ready in 24 hours
ASK YOUR QUESTION

Upload your document or paste your text directly into our platform. Your text is reviewed and refined by our expert editors (real people, not machines) who understand the nuances of English. Expect corrections, improvements, and insightful suggestions that enhance the clarity, tone, and professionalism of your writing.

In just a few minutes (or hours for longer documents), you'll receive your corrected text. Review the changes, make any final adjustments, and confidently share your polished English with the world.
You can count on a personalized, friendly service every time you use TextRanch. We're committed to helping you make a great impression with every word you write.

We proofread and edit these types of texts and documents:

Short texts Business Emails Personal Emails Social media posts Resume and Curriculum Vitae Business documents Sales proposal Research and academic papers Thesis Dissertation Essays Articles Blog posts and much more....

Powered By Humans

TextRanch Editors

AI is a great tool, but when it comes to perfecting your writing, we rely on real human editors.

  • All our editors are native English speakers.
  • Each editor has passed a rigorous admission test to ensure quality.
  • Our global team is ready to correct any text, anytime.

MEET OUR EDITORS

TextRanch Editors

Why choose TextRanch?

Complete Privacy

Your texts are safe and secure with us. We never share your information with third parties.

Affordable Pricing

No subscription fees and rates up to 50% cheaper than other online editing services.

100% Satisfaction

We guarantee that you'll be satisfied with the quality of our service or your money back.

Top Customer Service

Our team is here to help you with any questions you may have. Contact us anytime.

Our Customers Love Us!

We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283125 votes, and

People Feedback 4.9 Excellent - Reviews 2.137

"7 years without any disappointment. Always 100% satisfied. You guys are the best in the world at what you do. Thank you so much :)"

Profile picture of Zubair from Bangladesh

Zubair
from Bangladesh From

"I wasn't aware of this service, it's fascinating and more reliable than standard IA tools available on the internet"

Profile picture of Arturo from Mexico

Arturo
from Mexico From

"In a world of text messages and online communication, this is great to have as a live tool. Thank you."

Profile picture of Selena from USA

Selena
from USA From

"Wow, it's just so excellent. I never would have believed I could have a sure and excellent English companion. Thanks, TextRanch."

Profile picture of Ifiok from Nigeria

Ifiok
from Nigeria From

"This is my first time using TextRanch, and I like how the editors take time to correct my text. To everyone who has never used TextRanch before, I highly recommend trying it."

Profile picture of Wilson from France

Wilson
from France From

"It is an amazing source of feedback because, as a non-native speaker, I really need to have a reliable helper correct my text."

Profile picture of Susan from Germany

Susan
from Germany From

Trusted by Hundreds Teams

Facebook logo
Accenture logo
Air Asia logo
AirBus logo
Amazon logo
Bayer logo
Decathlon logo
Docusign logo
Ebay logo
Fiverr logo
Fossil logo
Keller Williams logo
LinkedIn logo
Loreal logo
Motorola logo
Orange logo
Roche logo
Salesforce logo
Stellantis logo