"this is a full-length paper" vs "this is a full length paper"

Question

"this is a full-length paper" vs "this is a full length paper"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. "This is a full-length paper" is correct when describing a paper that is of standard length or longer. On the other hand, "this is a full length paper" is correct when emphasizing that the paper is not abbreviated or shortened.

Last Updated: March 31, 2024

Use this phrase when you want to emphasize that the paper is of standard length or longer.

Examples:

This is a full-length paper on the effects of climate change.
She submitted a full-length paper for the conference.
The professor requested a full-length paper for the assignment.

Alternatives:

this is a lengthy paper
this is a comprehensive paper
this is a detailed paper
this is a thorough paper
this is a complete paper

Use this phrase when you want to stress that the paper is not shortened or abbreviated.

Examples:

This is a full length paper, not a summary.
She wanted to present a full length paper to the committee.
The journal only accepts full length papers.

Alternatives:

this is an unabridged paper
this is a complete paper
this is a detailed paper
this is a thorough paper
this is a comprehensive paper

Answer 1

this is a full-length paper

This phrase is correct and commonly used when describing a paper that is of standard length or longer.

Answer 2

this is a full length paper

This phrase is correct and commonly used when emphasizing that the paper is not abbreviated or shortened.

"this is a full-length paper" vs "this is a full length paper"

this is a full-length paper

this is a full length paper

Related Comparisons