1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

"Things have changed for him." vs "Things had changed for him."

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. "Things had changed for him." is used when referring to a past event or situation that had already changed at a specific point in the past. "Things have changed for him." is used when referring to a more recent or ongoing change that is still relevant in the present.

Last Updated: March 08, 2024

Things have changed for him.

This phrase is correct when referring to a more recent or ongoing change that is still relevant in the present.

This phrase is used to describe a change that has occurred recently or is still ongoing and is relevant in the present.

Alternatives:

  • Things are different for him now.
  • Things have been altered for him.
  • Things have been different for him.
  • Things have been changed for him.
  • Things have altered for him.

Things had changed for him.

This phrase is correct when referring to a past event or situation that had already changed at a specific point in the past.

This phrase is used to describe a change that occurred in the past and is no longer relevant in the present.

Alternatives:

  • Things changed for him.
  • Things were different for him.
  • Things were changed for him.
  • Things had been altered for him.
  • Things had been different for him.

Related Comparisons

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!