they have to had vs they have to vae

The comparison between 'they have to had' and 'they have to vae' doesn't make sense as both phrases are incorrect in English. 'Have to' is followed by the base form of the verb, not the past participle or a misspelled word.

Last updated: March 23, 2024 • 794 views

This phrase is incorrect in English. 'Have to' is followed by the base form of the verb, not the past participle.

"they have to had"

The correct form is 'they have to have.'

Show examples from the web [+]

They have to have had people on the ground setting this up.
They seem to have had a rough time of it.
So they would have had to take possession of it before that happened.
They would have had to rebuild a mint just to print those bills.
They have had to operate with extremely difficult procedures.
Together, they have had to bring the legislative process to a successful outcome.
Which means they would have had to have crossed paths with him - in order to deliver it.
They'd have had to come all the way back in.
If you're right, they'd have had to paid off more than just Vice.
If someone wanted to tamper with it, they would have had to perform an EVA.
And to do that, they would have had to hack a lot of other machines.
After all, they would have had to give up their careers.
They haven't had to speak to each other in ten millennia.
If the guerrilla attacked the base, they would have had to enter through this side Lieutenant.
So they would have had to take possession of it before that happened.
By contrast, SOLVIT Centres have resolved 80 % of the problems they have had to deal with.
The bank kept it out of the news, but they would have had to report it.
They seem to have had a rough time of it.
They seem to have had a good time in Rome.
For others, however, political transition made it more difficult to rely on old bonds and they have had to build national development strategies from the scratch, like Bulgaria and Romania.

Alternatives:

they have to have
they must have
they need to have
they are required to have
they should have

This phrase is incorrect in English. 'Have to' is followed by the base form of the verb, not a misspelled word.

"they have to vae"

The correct form is 'they have to.'

Show examples from the web [+]

There'll be no "Vae, puto, deus fio!" around here.
"Vae victis", which means "Woe betide the defeated!"

Alternatives:

they have to
they must
they need to
they are required to
they should

How TextRanch works

Fast and reliable proofreading, editing, and language advice tailored to your needs.

1. Choose Your Service

Quick Text Editing

Emails and short texts
Proofreading & editing
Ready in 5-10 minutes

SUBMIT YOUR TEXT NOW

Document Editing

Documents of any type (*.docx)
Advanced & Premium editing
Ready in as little as 4 hours

UPLOAD YOUR DOCUMENT

Ask an Editor

Personalized answers to your language questions
Expert guidance on grammar, style, and usage
Ready in 24 hours

ASK YOUR QUESTION

Upload your document or paste your text directly into our platform. Your text is reviewed and refined by our expert editors (real people, not machines) who understand the nuances of English. Expect corrections, improvements, and insightful suggestions that enhance the clarity, tone, and professionalism of your writing.

3. Receive Your Polished Text

In just a few minutes (or hours for longer documents), you'll receive your corrected text. Review the changes, make any final adjustments, and confidently share your polished English with the world.
You can count on a personalized, friendly service every time you use TextRanch. We're committed to helping you make a great impression with every word you write.

We proofread and edit these types of texts and documents:

Short texts Business Emails Personal Emails Social media posts Resume and Curriculum Vitae Business documents Sales proposal Research and academic papers Thesis Dissertation Essays Articles Blog posts and much more....

Why choose TextRanch?

Complete Privacy

Your texts are safe and secure with us. We never share your information with third parties.

Affordable Pricing

No subscription fees and rates up to 50% cheaper than other online editing services.

100% Satisfaction

We guarantee that you'll be satisfied with the quality of our service or your money back.

Top Customer Service

Our team is here to help you with any questions you may have. Contact us anytime.

Our Customers Love Us!

We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283125 votes, and

4.9 Excellent - Reviews 2.137

"7 years without any disappointment. Always 100% satisfied. You guys are the best in the world at what you do. Thank you so much :)"

Zubair
from Bangladesh

"I wasn't aware of this service, it's fascinating and more reliable than standard IA tools available on the internet"

Arturo
from Mexico

"In a world of text messages and online communication, this is great to have as a live tool. Thank you."

Selena
from USA

"Wow, it's just so excellent. I never would have believed I could have a sure and excellent English companion. Thanks, TextRanch."

Ifiok
from Nigeria

"This is my first time using TextRanch, and I like how the editors take time to correct my text. To everyone who has never used TextRanch before, I highly recommend trying it."

Wilson
from France

"It is an amazing source of feedback because, as a non-native speaker, I really need to have a reliable helper correct my text."

Susan
from Germany

they have to had vs they have to vae

"they have to had"

"they have to vae"

Related Comparisons

2. Submit Your Text

3. Receive Your Polished Text