they are both vs they both are

Both "they are both" and "they both are" are correct, but they are used in different contexts. "They are both" is commonly used to introduce two items or people that share a characteristic, while "they both are" is used to emphasize that two people or things are doing something together.

Last updated: March 28, 2024 • 4619 views

they are both

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

This phrase is used to introduce two items or people that share a characteristic. It is often followed by a noun or adjective.

Examples:

They are both excellent students.
They are both wearing blue shirts.
They are both very talented musicians.

Show examples from the web [+]

And they are both very careful about how they manage themselves at work.
For clarity, they are both adopted.
Also they are both related to the trade negotiations following the launch of these in Doha.
But now, they are both gone!
This distinction is not realistic, for they are both run by one and the same leader, namely Mr Nasrallah.
There is a humanitarian dimension in the Philippines case, but there is also a clearly political dimension, and they are both fundamental if we want to make progress in the frustrated peace talks.
First, though both systems behave in very complicated ways, they are both based on surprisingly simple mathematical rules.
It really doesn't look anything like it, except for the fact that they are both watches and have hands and tell time.
They live near the park, Rue Jean Buridan, and they are both sure they saw Bourg out walking in that park during our timeframe.
It is as if one were to talk about human rights and human diseases in a block because they are both 'human', which is not a very good idea.
As regards the peace process in the Middle East, they are both committed to working towards a peaceful solution in line with the road map.
My constituent has told me that his wife has a Bulgarian Residence Card and that they are both residents of Bulgaria.
Aside from the fact that they are both criminals, what do these two have in common?
Violent resistance and nonviolent resistance share one very important thing in common; they are both a form of theater seeking an audience to their cause.
As we know, they are both highly competent and gifted, but the direction in which they want to take the European Union is not necessarily the one that I am in favour of.
We do not know and we do not claim to know, nor do we presume to tell Parliament that one kind of research is better than another: they are both valuable.
Two technologies are complements as opposed to substitutes when they are both required to produce the product or carry out the process to which the technologies relate.
Two technologies [68] are complements as opposed to substitutes when they are both required to produce the product or carry out the process to which the technologies relate.
For the purposes of this Article, counterparties shall be considered to be included in the same consolidation when they are both either:
They are both very clear and easy to understand.

Alternatives:

Both of them are
Both are
They both have
They both like
They both enjoy

they both are

This phrase is correct but less commonly used in English.

This phrase is used to emphasize that two people or things are doing something together. It is often followed by a verb.