🎁 A holiday package to celebrate the season! Click here and shop now!

TextRanch

The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

These are no cardiotoxic vs These are noncardiotoxic

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'These are noncardiotoxic' is the more common and preferred form when describing substances that are not toxic to the heart. 'These are no cardiotoxic' is less common and may sound awkward to native English speakers.

Last updated: March 30, 2024 • 695 views

These are no cardiotoxic

This phrase is technically correct but less common in English. It may sound awkward to native speakers.

This phrase can be used to convey the idea that something is not toxic to the heart, but it is less commonly used compared to 'noncardiotoxic'.
  • Reversible cardiotoxic effects were observed in rabbits following intravenous administration of tacrolimus.
  • Reversible cardiotoxic effects were observed in rabbits following intravenous administration of tacrolimus.
  • Simultaneous treatment with cardiotoxic substances (eg anthracyclines).
  • Therefore patients with a history of cardiac disease and/ or cardiotoxic chemotherapy should be monitored closely.
  • Congestive heart failure, cardiomyopathy, and decreased ejection fraction have been reported in patients previously treated with potentially cardiotoxic agents.
  • Rabbits were shown to be especially sensitive to intravenous administration of tacrolimus, reversible cardiotoxic effects being observed.
  • The total dose of doxorubicin hydrochloride must also take into account any previous (or concomitant) therapy with cardiotoxic compounds such as other anthracyclines/ anthraquinones or e. g.
  • Most of the patients who experienced CHF had metastatic breast cancer and had received previous treatment with anthracyclines, prior radiotherapy to the left chest wall or other risk factors for CHF, such as pre-existing coronary heart disease or concomitant cardiotoxic therapy.
  • Combinations with cardiotoxic substances (eg anthracyclines) should be avoided because it is possible that tasonermin could enhance cardiotoxicity, as has been observed in preclinical 13-week toxicological investigations.
  • The total dose of Myocet should also take into account any previous, or concomitant, therapy with other cardiotoxic compounds, including anthracyclines and anthraquinones.
  • Concomitant treatment with other substances reported to be cardiotoxic or with cardiologically active substances (e. g. calcium antagonists) may increase the risk for cardiotoxicity.
  • Assessment and ongoing monitoring of cardiac function (e. g. echocardiography, heart rate and body weight) should be considered in patients previously treated with potentially cardiotoxic agents.
  • Madam President, dichloromethane has narcotic effects causing damage to the central nervous system and loss of consciousness, as well as cardiotoxic effects.
  • Cardiovascular (CVS) adverse events, particularly arrhythmia, appeared to be correlated mostly with pre-existing CVS disease and prior therapy with cardiotoxic agents (see section 4.4).
  • Rabbits were shown to be especially sensitive to intravenous administration of tacrolimus, reversible cardiotoxic effects being observed. ed
  • There have been rare cases of torsades de pointes in patients taking voriconazole who had risk factors, such as history of cardiotoxic chemotherapy, cardiomyopathy, hypokalaemia and concomitant medications that may have been contributory.
  • Rabbits were shown to be especially sensitive to intravenous administration of tacrolimus, reversible cardiotoxic effects being observed.
  • The situation is still worsened bythe fact that this is a particularly poisonous species (its poison is cardiotoxic affecting the red blood cells) while the potential cost of the resulting socioeconomic damage caused greatly exceeds the necessary investment to contain the problem.
  • Occurred at various times up to several months after completion of MabThera therapy 5 observed mainly in patients with prior cardiac condition and/ or cardiotoxic chemotherapy and were mostly associated with infusion-related reactions 6 includes fatal cases
  • ori Cardiovascular (CVS) adverse events, particularly arrhythmia, appeared to be correlated mostly with pre- existing CVS disease and prior therapy with cardiotoxic agents (see section 4.4).

Alternatives:

  • these are noncardiotoxic

These are noncardiotoxic

This phrase is the more common and preferred form when describing substances that are not toxic to the heart.

This phrase is used to describe substances that do not have toxic effects on the heart.
  • These are fundamental rights, and a simple cost-benefit analysis is inappropriate where these are concerned.
  • These are... these are... these are fine.
  • These are serious evidence is incriminating.
  • These aren't all my suitcases.
  • These are the best oatmeal raisin cookies.
  • These are complex variables to coordinate.
  • These are trees and power lines blocking every road up.
  • These are the conditions to release your mother.
  • These are the office protocol manuals.
  • These are the ones who showed extreme anger.
  • These are Specialist Lake's platoon mates.
  • These are the people I killed.
  • Anyway... these are Detective Bell's canvass reports.
  • These are defensive wounds, indicating a struggle.
  • Secondly, these are two completely different questions.
  • These are sophisticated entities which should be treated as eligible counterparties.
  • These are the indictments against America.
  • These are photographs of German military graduation classes.
  • These are not in question in the Intergovernmental Conference.
  • These are urine samples from the football players.

Alternatives:

  • these are no cardiotoxic

Related Comparisons

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9TextRanch on TrustPilot).

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!

×

💝 TextRanch Holidays Offer! 💝️

25% special discount
Stock up on credits for the entire year!

Grab this offer now!