"There were no guards" vs "There weren't any guards"

Question

"There were no guards" vs "There weren't any guards"

Both phrases are correct and can be used interchangeably. They convey the same meaning that no guards were present. The choice between 'there weren't any guards' and 'there were no guards' depends on personal preference or the overall style of writing.

Last Updated: March 20, 2024

This phrase is used to indicate the absence of guards in a specific location or situation.

Examples:

There were no guards at the gate.
I was relieved to find out there were no guards in the area.
There were no guards on duty that day.
He realized there were no guards around the perimeter.
There were no guards patrolling the premises.

Alternatives:

There weren't any guards
No guards were present
There were no security personnel
No one was guarding the place
The location was unguarded

This phrase is used to indicate the absence of guards in a specific location or situation.

Examples:

There weren't any guards at the entrance.
I checked, but there weren't any guards around the building.
There weren't any guards on duty that night.
She was surprised that there weren't any guards in the museum.
There weren't any guards patrolling the area.

Alternatives:

There were no guards
No guards were present
There were no security personnel
No one was guarding the place
The location was unguarded

Answer 1

There were no guards

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Answer 2

There weren't any guards

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

"There were no guards" vs "There weren't any guards"

There were no guards

There weren't any guards

Related Comparisons