TextRanch
The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

TextRanch Editors

there was no vs there were no notations

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'There was no' is used when referring to a singular noun or uncountable noun, while 'There were no notations' is used when referring to a plural noun. Therefore, the choice between the two depends on the noun being described.

Last updated: March 15, 2024 • 1101 views

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

"there was no"

This phrase is used when referring to a singular noun or uncountable noun to indicate the absence of something.

Examples:

  • There was no milk left in the fridge.
  • There was no time to waste.
  • There was no need to worry.
  • They said there was no hope.
  • Come on, we ruled him out because there was no motive.
  • He said there was no information or records.
  • Unfortunately, there was no other DNA on them.
  • Except there was no exit wound.
  • When you left, there was no fire.
  • That's when I knew there was no hope.
  • Freud said there was no cure but that perhaps he could transform unbearable unhappiness into simple human misery.
  • Your own lab said that there was no evidence.
  • Because there was no other way to see you.
  • Lab tests would have detected that there was no blood on them.
  • The thing is, there was no protection on the source computer.
  • Unfortunately, there was no surveillance video.
  • But there was no indication that the thrombosis was this bad.
  • The food was not enough to sustain life, there was no milk, there was no meat, there was no food, there was nothing.
  • Actually, there was no competition.
  • Actually, there was no thought.
  • Look, there was no conversing.
  • Told you there was no professor here.
  • Mother, there was no hussy.

Alternatives:

  • There wasn't any
  • There was none
  • There was nothing

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

"there were no notations"

This phrase is used when referring to a plural noun to indicate the absence of specific written or printed notes or marks.

Examples:

  • There were no notations in the margin of the book.
  • There were no notations on the musical score.
  • There were no notations to indicate the changes.
  • Notation characterizing the soil horizon according to a specified classification system.
  • Those notations - they're song lyrics.
  • Those notations, they're song lyrics.
  • (The notation G is used by CEN; the notation Lt is used by CIE; the notation LP is used by IEC and CENELEC).
  • Boolean value to indicate whether the FAO horizon notation was the original notation to describe the horizon.
  • The number notation uses the notation you globally choose in & kcontrolcenter; in Regional & Accessibility Country/ Region & Language Numbers. Numbers are right justified by default.
  • It will have descriptions, histories, notations...
  • We removed all notations from her file.
  • You must be relieved that you could passing notation.
  • From your pencilled notations... 4...
  • My client's notebook contains her choreographic notations dated March 1st.
  • But a certain Sister Bernadette made notations from memory.
  • I'm deciphering these notations that your father made in this book.
  • Additional appropriate notations may be introduced by amendments to the Committee's methodology document.
  • FAO Horizon Notation Type (FAOHorizonNotationType)
  • Number used to indicate a discontinuity in the horizon notation.
  • Order number of the vertical subdivision in the horizon notation.
  • Other Horizon Notation Type (OtherHorizonNotationType)
  • Only one Other Horizon Notation Type classification shall be used for a dataset.
  • The following predicate notation is used:

Alternatives:

  • There were no markings
  • There were no annotations
  • There were no comments

Related Comparisons

How TextRanch works

Fast and reliable proofreading, editing, and language advice tailored to your needs.

1. Choose Your Service

Quick Text Editing

  • Emails and short texts
  • Proofreading & editing
  • Ready in 5-10 minutes
SUBMIT YOUR TEXT NOW

Document Editing

  • Documents of any type (*.docx)
  • Advanced & Premium editing
  • Ready in as little as 4 hours
UPLOAD YOUR DOCUMENT

Ask an Editor

  • Personalized answers to your language questions
  • Expert guidance on grammar, style, and usage
  • Ready in 24 hours
ASK YOUR QUESTION

Upload your document or paste your text directly into our platform. Your text is reviewed and refined by our expert editors (real people, not machines) who understand the nuances of English. Expect corrections, improvements, and insightful suggestions that enhance the clarity, tone, and professionalism of your writing.

In just a few minutes (or hours for longer documents), you'll receive your corrected text. Review the changes, make any final adjustments, and confidently share your polished English with the world.
You can count on a personalized, friendly service every time you use TextRanch. We're committed to helping you make a great impression with every word you write.

We proofread and edit these types of texts and documents:

Short texts Business Emails Personal Emails Social media posts Resume and Curriculum Vitae Business documents Sales proposal Research and academic papers Thesis Dissertation Essays Articles Blog posts and much more....

Powered By Humans

TextRanch Editors

AI is a great tool, but when it comes to perfecting your writing, we rely on real human editors.

  • All our editors are native English speakers.
  • Each editor has passed a rigorous admission test to ensure quality.
  • Our global team is ready to correct any text, anytime.

MEET OUR EDITORS

TextRanch Editors

Why choose TextRanch?

Complete Privacy

Your texts are safe and secure with us. We never share your information with third parties.

Affordable Pricing

No subscription fees and rates up to 50% cheaper than other online editing services.

100% Satisfaction

We guarantee that you'll be satisfied with the quality of our service or your money back.

Top Customer Service

Our team is here to help you with any questions you may have. Contact us anytime.

Our Customers Love Us!

We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283125 votes, and

People Feedback 4.9 Excellent - Reviews 2.137

"7 years without any disappointment. Always 100% satisfied. You guys are the best in the world at what you do. Thank you so much :)"

Profile picture of Zubair from Bangladesh

Zubair
from Bangladesh From

"I wasn't aware of this service, it's fascinating and more reliable than standard IA tools available on the internet"

Profile picture of Arturo from Mexico

Arturo
from Mexico From

"In a world of text messages and online communication, this is great to have as a live tool. Thank you."

Profile picture of Selena from USA

Selena
from USA From

"Wow, it's just so excellent. I never would have believed I could have a sure and excellent English companion. Thanks, TextRanch."

Profile picture of Ifiok from Nigeria

Ifiok
from Nigeria From

"This is my first time using TextRanch, and I like how the editors take time to correct my text. To everyone who has never used TextRanch before, I highly recommend trying it."

Profile picture of Wilson from France

Wilson
from France From

"It is an amazing source of feedback because, as a non-native speaker, I really need to have a reliable helper correct my text."

Profile picture of Susan from Germany

Susan
from Germany From

Trusted by Hundreds Teams

Facebook logo
Accenture logo
Air Asia logo
AirBus logo
Amazon logo
Bayer logo
Decathlon logo
Docusign logo
Ebay logo
Fiverr logo
Fossil logo
Keller Williams logo
LinkedIn logo
Loreal logo
Motorola logo
Orange logo
Roche logo
Salesforce logo
Stellantis logo