"There must always be" vs "There always must be"

Question

"There must always be" vs "There always must be"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'There must always be' is more commonly used and sounds more natural in English. It is used to emphasize the necessity of something being present continuously. On the other hand, 'There always must be' is less common and may sound a bit awkward. It can still be used to convey the same meaning, but it is not as idiomatic.

Last Updated: March 31, 2024

This phrase is used to emphasize the necessity of something being present continuously.

Examples:

There must always be a backup plan in case of emergencies.
There must always be a balance between work and personal life.
There must always be a way to solve the problem.
There must always be a reason for his actions.
There must always be a sense of responsibility in leadership.

Alternatives:

There always needs to be
There should always be
There always has to be
There always must exist
There always must be present

This phrase can be used to emphasize the necessity of something being present continuously, but it is not as idiomatic as 'There must always be.'

Examples:

There always must be a reason behind his actions.
There always must be a way to solve the problem.
There always must be a balance between work and personal life.

Alternatives:

There must always be
There always needs to be
There should always be
There always has to be
There always must exist

Answer 1

There must always be

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Answer 2

There always must be

This phrase is correct but less common in English.

"There must always be" vs "There always must be"

There must always be

There always must be

Related Comparisons