"There is not much damage" vs "There ia not much lives lost"

Question

"There is not much damage" vs "There ia not much lives lost"

The correct phrase is "there is not much damage." The second phrase, "there ia not much lives lost," is incorrect due to the incorrect verb form and pluralization. The first phrase is commonly used to indicate that the amount of damage is minimal.

Last Updated: March 17, 2024

This phrase is used to convey that the amount of damage is small or insignificant.

Examples:

After the storm, there is not much damage to the house.
Fortunately, there is not much damage to the car.
The earthquake caused some destruction, but there is not much damage overall.
The fire was contained quickly, so there is not much damage to the building.
The floodwaters receded, leaving not much damage behind.

Alternatives:

there are not many lives lost
there were not many lives lost
not many lives were lost
few lives were lost
there were few lives lost

Answer 1

There is not much damage

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to indicate minimal damage.

Answer 2

There ia not much lives lost

This phrase is incorrect due to the verb form and pluralization. The correct form would be "there are not many lives lost."

"There is not much damage" vs "There ia not much lives lost"

There is not much damage

There ia not much lives lost

Related Comparisons