"There is no money." vs "There is not money."

Question

"There is no money." vs "There is not money."

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'There is no money.' is the more common and natural way to express the absence of money. 'There is not money.' is less common and might sound awkward to native English speakers.

Last Updated: March 24, 2024

This phrase is the standard way to express that there is an absence of money. It is clear and widely understood by English speakers.

Alternatives:

There isn't any money.
Money is not available.
There is a lack of money.
Money is scarce.
We are out of money.

This phrase can be used to express the absence of money, but it might sound awkward to native English speakers. It is more common to use 'There is no money.' instead.

Alternatives:

There is no money.
There isn't any money.
Money is not available.
There is a lack of money.
Money is scarce.

Answer 1

There is no money.

This phrase is the more common and natural way to express the absence of money.

Answer 2

There is not money.

This phrase is grammatically correct but less common in English.

"There is no money." vs "There is not money."

There is no money.

There is not money.

Related Comparisons