there is no risk to people vs there is no risk for people

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in slightly different contexts. 'There is no risk to people' is commonly used when describing a situation where people are not in danger or exposed to harm. On the other hand, 'There is no risk for people' is used to indicate that people are not at risk of something negative happening to them.

Last updated: March 27, 2024 • 980 views

there is no risk to people

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

This phrase is used to indicate that people are not in danger or exposed to harm.

Examples:

There is no risk to people in this area.
The new safety measures ensure there is no risk to people.
The vaccine has been tested extensively, and there is no risk to people.

Show examples from the web [+]

It is unacceptable, given that it cannot seriously be claimed that there is no risk, that people's lives and health are being put at risk, thus violating their rights.
There is no risk to the ventilation shaft itself, they understand their instructions.
There is no risk to a cortisol injection.
The Greek authorities have given assurances that there is no risk to Greece.
With the right people, there is no risk.
Benzene is a human genotoxic carcinogen and there is no identifiable threshold below which there is no risk to human health.
In line with the amendment seeking to delete paragraph 3(b)(ii), the Member States should guarantee that there is no risk to human or animal health.
If there is no risk to human health and the environment, an authorisation is given.
I must emphasise that we do not import any poultry from Vietnam, so there is no risk to public health.
Paragraph 2 shall not apply where an authorisation has been given by the competent authority in order to permit the use of products in accordance with Directive 90/667/EEC, provided that there is no risk to public or animal health.
The owner of the farm in question has said that 'none of the affected birds has entered the food chain and there is no risk to consumers'.
The Commission believes that, providing the legal obligations of distributors are fully respected, there is no risk to the environment during transportation of medicinal products.
However, it is certain that poultry farms are being adequately monitored and that there is no risk to human health.
(9) Benzene is a human genotoxic carcinogen and there is no identifiable threshold below which there is no risk to human health.
4. Paragraph 2 shall not apply where an authorisation has been given by the competent authority in order to permit the use of products in accordance with Directive 90/667/EEC, provided that there is no risk to public or animal health.
there is no risk of duplicate financing.
Provided that there is no risk of harmful organisms spreading:
You have said that there is no risk.
Their scope is so carefully circumscribed that there is no risk of legal uncertainty.
There is no risk of monopoly.

Alternatives:

There is no danger to people
People are not at risk
People are safe

there is no risk for people

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

This phrase is used to indicate that people are not at risk of something negative happening to them.

Examples:

There is no risk for people to develop allergies.
The new regulations ensure there is no risk for people.
The safety procedures guarantee there is no risk for people.

Show examples from the web [+]

It is unacceptable, given that it cannot seriously be claimed that there is no risk, that people's lives and health are being put at risk, thus violating their rights.
With the right people, there is no risk.
The maximum residue limits must scientifically ensure that there is no risk for any persons from the day they are born.
As there is no risk for consumers, MRLs for those products should be set in Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 at the level identified by the Authority.
Taking into account additional information on the good agricultural practices provided by the Netherlands and as there is no risk for consumers, MRLs for those products should be set in Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 at the existing level.
As regards bulb vegetables - others, the MRL should be set at a different level than identified by the Authority, given that there is no risk for consumers and based on additional information on the good agricultural practices provided by Germany.
As there is no risk for consumers, MRLs for those products should be set in Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 at the level identified by the Authority.
When there is no exposure to these components there is no risk for children's health.
Taking into account additional information on the good agricultural practice provided by Belgium and as there is no risk for consumers, the MRL for spring onions should be set in Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 at the existing level.
Cerenia does not represent a particular risk for people.
The risks for people and the environment are predetermined.
minimising risk for people and the environment.
there is no risk of duplicate financing.
Provided that there is no risk of harmful organisms spreading:
There is no risk to the ventilation shaft itself, they understand their instructions.
You have said that there is no risk.
Their scope is so carefully circumscribed that there is no risk of legal uncertainty.
There is no risk to a cortisol injection.
There is no risk of monopoly.
At this stage there is no risk of undersupply of the EU wheat market.

Alternatives:

People are not in danger
People are safe from harm
People are not exposed to risk

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9).

"Thank you!"
Sachi Nakama July 2024
"I have literally been through chat, PI, claude, bard and bing and I got conflicting answers! Thank you! Human intelligence reigns!"
Retha July 2024
"Faster than AI"
CYNTHIA December 2023
"This was very helpful and I personally think this site is the best."
Kaden October 2023
"It was extremely thorough and very helpful!"
imperialelisa October 2023
"7 years without any disappointment. Always 100% satisfied. You guys are the best in the world at what you do. Thank you so much :)"
Zubair Alam October 2023
"In a world of text messages and online communication, this is great to have as a live tool. Thank you."
Selena October 2023
"Without textranch I would be stuck!"
宏祐 October 2023
"Accuracy and fast response. Personal comments from editor. Thank you."
Clh September 2023
"I wasn't aware of this service, it's fascinating and more reliable than standard IA tools available on the internet"
Arturo September 2023
"The fact that you can get reliable fast feedback on your texts."
Vinicius Antonio August 2023
"you guys are better than grammarly i'm being honest here"
ordinary July 2023
"OMG! This is really good than any other text correction tools I've used so far. Highly recommend this."
Vehan July 2023
"Very fast and accurate. thank you."
mojtaba July 2023
"I love this app because it's help to writing skills all of students ♥️"
Tarisini July 2023
"This was exactly the mistake I was looking for, the wording dind´t sound right at first. Better than grammarly!"
Ente July 2023
"The immediate help that I received was reassuring and very satisfactory. Thanks."
priiiyanshuu July 2023
"this helps A LOT for my studies."
kathnunez02 June 2023
"Woow!! I would never have expected such precision! Thank you soooo much!!"
Berta June 2023
"Real Time Editor and not AI. Many Thanks."
Priya June 2023
"The very first thing excites me about Textranch is how much your editors care."
sepideh June 2023
"The fact that texts are checked by human editors rather than by AI, etc. I appreciate this!"
Анна June 2023
"Feel welcome, immediate response, high quality feedback"
martin.roy June 2023
"This is the best app that I have ever seen"
Burulai May 2023

there is no risk to people vs there is no risk for people