there is no risk to people vs there is no risk for people

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in slightly different contexts. 'There is no risk to people' is commonly used when describing a situation where people are not in danger or exposed to harm. On the other hand, 'There is no risk for people' is used to indicate that people are not at risk of something negative happening to them.

Last updated: March 27, 2024 • 1147 views

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

"there is no risk to people"

This phrase is used to indicate that people are not in danger or exposed to harm.

Examples:

There is no risk to people in this area.
The new safety measures ensure there is no risk to people.
The vaccine has been tested extensively, and there is no risk to people.

Show examples from the web [+]

It is unacceptable, given that it cannot seriously be claimed that there is no risk, that people's lives and health are being put at risk, thus violating their rights.
There is no risk to the ventilation shaft itself, they understand their instructions.
There is no risk to a cortisol injection.
The Greek authorities have given assurances that there is no risk to Greece.
With the right people, there is no risk.
Benzene is a human genotoxic carcinogen and there is no identifiable threshold below which there is no risk to human health.
In line with the amendment seeking to delete paragraph 3(b)(ii), the Member States should guarantee that there is no risk to human or animal health.
If there is no risk to human health and the environment, an authorisation is given.
I must emphasise that we do not import any poultry from Vietnam, so there is no risk to public health.
Paragraph 2 shall not apply where an authorisation has been given by the competent authority in order to permit the use of products in accordance with Directive 90/667/EEC, provided that there is no risk to public or animal health.
The owner of the farm in question has said that 'none of the affected birds has entered the food chain and there is no risk to consumers'.
The Commission believes that, providing the legal obligations of distributors are fully respected, there is no risk to the environment during transportation of medicinal products.
However, it is certain that poultry farms are being adequately monitored and that there is no risk to human health.
(9) Benzene is a human genotoxic carcinogen and there is no identifiable threshold below which there is no risk to human health.
4. Paragraph 2 shall not apply where an authorisation has been given by the competent authority in order to permit the use of products in accordance with Directive 90/667/EEC, provided that there is no risk to public or animal health.
there is no risk of duplicate financing.
Provided that there is no risk of harmful organisms spreading:
You have said that there is no risk.
Their scope is so carefully circumscribed that there is no risk of legal uncertainty.
There is no risk of monopoly.

Alternatives:

There is no danger to people
People are not at risk
People are safe

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

"there is no risk for people"

This phrase is used to indicate that people are not at risk of something negative happening to them.

Examples:

There is no risk for people to develop allergies.
The new regulations ensure there is no risk for people.
The safety procedures guarantee there is no risk for people.

Show examples from the web [+]

It is unacceptable, given that it cannot seriously be claimed that there is no risk, that people's lives and health are being put at risk, thus violating their rights.
With the right people, there is no risk.
The maximum residue limits must scientifically ensure that there is no risk for any persons from the day they are born.
As there is no risk for consumers, MRLs for those products should be set in Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 at the level identified by the Authority.
Taking into account additional information on the good agricultural practices provided by the Netherlands and as there is no risk for consumers, MRLs for those products should be set in Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 at the existing level.
As regards bulb vegetables - others, the MRL should be set at a different level than identified by the Authority, given that there is no risk for consumers and based on additional information on the good agricultural practices provided by Germany.
As there is no risk for consumers, MRLs for those products should be set in Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 at the level identified by the Authority.
When there is no exposure to these components there is no risk for children's health.
Taking into account additional information on the good agricultural practice provided by Belgium and as there is no risk for consumers, the MRL for spring onions should be set in Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 at the existing level.
Cerenia does not represent a particular risk for people.
The risks for people and the environment are predetermined.
minimising risk for people and the environment.
there is no risk of duplicate financing.
Provided that there is no risk of harmful organisms spreading:
There is no risk to the ventilation shaft itself, they understand their instructions.
You have said that there is no risk.
Their scope is so carefully circumscribed that there is no risk of legal uncertainty.
There is no risk to a cortisol injection.
There is no risk of monopoly.
At this stage there is no risk of undersupply of the EU wheat market.

Alternatives:

People are not in danger
People are safe from harm
People are not exposed to risk

How TextRanch works

Fast and reliable proofreading, editing, and language advice tailored to your needs.

1. Choose Your Service

Quick Text Editing

Emails and short texts
Proofreading & editing
Ready in 5-10 minutes

SUBMIT YOUR TEXT NOW

Document Editing

Documents of any type (*.docx)
Advanced & Premium editing
Ready in as little as 4 hours

UPLOAD YOUR DOCUMENT

Ask an Editor

Personalized answers to your language questions
Expert guidance on grammar, style, and usage
Ready in 24 hours

ASK YOUR QUESTION

Upload your document or paste your text directly into our platform. Your text is reviewed and refined by our expert editors (real people, not machines) who understand the nuances of English. Expect corrections, improvements, and insightful suggestions that enhance the clarity, tone, and professionalism of your writing.

3. Receive Your Polished Text

In just a few minutes (or hours for longer documents), you'll receive your corrected text. Review the changes, make any final adjustments, and confidently share your polished English with the world.
You can count on a personalized, friendly service every time you use TextRanch. We're committed to helping you make a great impression with every word you write.

We proofread and edit these types of texts and documents:

Short texts Business Emails Personal Emails Social media posts Resume and Curriculum Vitae Business documents Sales proposal Research and academic papers Thesis Dissertation Essays Articles Blog posts and much more....

Our Customers Love Us!

We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283125 votes, and

4.9 Excellent - Reviews 2.137

"7 years without any disappointment. Always 100% satisfied. You guys are the best in the world at what you do. Thank you so much :)"

Zubair
from Bangladesh

"I wasn't aware of this service, it's fascinating and more reliable than standard IA tools available on the internet"

Arturo
from Mexico

"In a world of text messages and online communication, this is great to have as a live tool. Thank you."

Selena
from USA

"Wow, it's just so excellent. I never would have believed I could have a sure and excellent English companion. Thanks, TextRanch."

Ifiok
from Nigeria

"This is my first time using TextRanch, and I like how the editors take time to correct my text. To everyone who has never used TextRanch before, I highly recommend trying it."

Wilson
from France

"It is an amazing source of feedback because, as a non-native speaker, I really need to have a reliable helper correct my text."

Susan
from Germany

there is no risk to people vs there is no risk for people