Which one is correct?
"There is no coincidence" or "it could be a coincidence"?

TextRanch: The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

100% Human-Powered Editing!

There is no coincidence

This phrase is correct and can be used to convey that something is not a result of chance.

This phrase is used to emphasize that a particular event or situation is not a coincidence but rather has a specific cause or explanation.

it could be a coincidence

This phrase is correct and is used to suggest that something might be a result of chance.

This phrase is used when there is a possibility that a particular event or situation is a coincidence, meaning it happened by chance.
These two phrases are not directly comparable as they convey different meanings. 'There is no coincidence' implies that something is not a result of chance, while 'It could be a coincidence' suggests that something might be a result of chance. Therefore, the choice between the two depends on the intended meaning.

Last Updated: March 24, 2024

Related Comparisons

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!