"there is evidence" vs "there has been evidence"

Question

"there is evidence" vs "there has been evidence"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'There is evidence' is used to present current evidence, while 'there has been evidence' is used to refer to evidence that existed in the past up to the present moment.

Last Updated: March 15, 2024

This phrase is used to indicate the existence of evidence at the present moment.

Examples:

There is evidence to support the theory.
There is evidence of his involvement in the crime.

Alternatives:

Evidence exists
Evidence suggests
There are indications

This phrase is used to refer to evidence that existed in the past up to the present moment.

Examples:

There has been evidence of corruption in the company.
There has been evidence of a cover-up.

Alternatives:

Evidence has been present
Evidence has been shown
There has existed evidence

Answer 1

there is evidence

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Answer 2

there has been evidence

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

"there is evidence" vs "there has been evidence"

there is evidence

there has been evidence

Related Comparisons