TextRanch

The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

there are no many vs there is no many

The correct phrase is "there are no many." The phrase "there is no many" is incorrect in English. When referring to the absence of a large quantity, we use "there are no many."

Last updated: March 23, 2024 • 6547 views

there are no many

This phrase is correct in English when indicating the absence of a large quantity.

Use this phrase when you want to express that there is not a large number or amount of something.

Examples:

  • There are no many options available for dinner tonight.
  • There are no many people who can solve this problem.
  • There are no many opportunities like this one.
  • There are no many books on that subject in the library.
  • There are no many reasons to delay the project.
  • I have the impression that, although there are no longer many countries, but just one, we are doing less.
  • There are no doubt many people living on, for example, the Russian-Estonian border or the Slovenian-Croatian border who will be grateful for the very flexible solution now being proposed.
  • In the areas that are regulated, there are so many rules no human could possibly know it.
  • There are too many. No, no, you have to be able to.
  • Changes are only effective from \\begin{environment} to \\end{environment}. There are no limits as how many changes you can make inside an environment.

there is no many

This phrase is not correct in English. It is not used to indicate the absence of a large quantity.

  • There is no doubt that many fraudulent practices are directly related to the differences - sometimes significant - which exist between excise rates applied in the different Member States.
  • There is no doubt that many of the proposals are commendable in themselves, but neither the EU nor the European Parliament should have competence in these issues.
  • Personally, I am convinced that such referenda would show that there is no support in many Member States for greatly increased central power within the European Union.
  • There is no free media and many opponents of the ruling regime have either fled the country or are being detained as political prisoners.
  • Thirdly - and this is related to the second point - there is in many countries no supervision of collecting societies.
  • If you don't fix this, I might explode, and there is no telling how many lives I might ruin.
  • And again: There is no doubt that many fraudulent practices are directly related to the differences - sometimes significant - which exist between excise rates applied in the different Member States.
  • Finally, as regards the Council's allegation, which the Commission echoes, that there is no need for many specific references and explanations because they are covered by the examples given in the directive or contained elsewhere therein, this is chicanery.
  • There are question marks about the efficiency of the OMC, as there is no real commitment by many governments.
  • However, there is no disputing that in many countries of the Southern hemisphere, there is the potential - and the will - to bridge the digital divide.
  • In this context, it is important to recognise that there is no justification for the many barriers still encountered by small and medium-sized entrepreneurs.
  • There is no doubt that what many commentators are saying about these latest events is true: namely that the country is at a crossroads which we regard as critical.
  • There is no knowledge of many of the aspects indicated and therefore certain measures, for example, such as excessive separation of animals, is going to harm them, or in other words, things are going to be worse than before.
  • Critics accuse the government of using the Ergenekon case as justification for imprisoning secular-minded opponents and undermining the country's secular legacy, as there is no solid evidence against many of the defendants.
  • The fact of this change itself is not outrageous, because, of course, there is no such law in many European countries, but what is outrageous is the way in which this decision was made.
  • There is no doubt that for many years inland waterways have been a Cinderella of the transport industry, but that does not mean that we should forget about them and that we should not invest in them, because that is what is needed.

Related Comparisons

there is no cards vs there are no cards there are many vs There are so many there are many vs there is many there are not many vs there is not many there are not that many vs there are not many there are no requirements vs there is no requirements

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9TextRanch on TrustPilot).

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!