TextRanch
The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

TextRanch Editors

their results were similar to this one vs their results were similar to those seen in this study

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in slightly different contexts. The first phrase is more general and can refer to any results, while the second phrase specifically mentions results seen in a particular study. The choice between them depends on the level of specificity you want to convey.

Last updated: March 22, 2024 • 912 views

This phrase is correct and commonly used to indicate similarity between results.

"their results were similar to this one"

This phrase is used to compare results, indicating that they are similar to a specific result.

Examples:

  • Her results were similar to this one, showing a clear pattern of improvement.
  • The team's results were similar to this one, suggesting a common underlying cause.
  • The efficacy results were similar to those seen in the controlled phase of the studies.
  • In the subgroup with two organ dysfunctions, the results were similar to those seen in the PROWESS trial.
  • These results were similar to those seen in other published studies using intravenous cladribine and were better than results seen with alternative treatments such as interferon alfa and pentostatin.
  • - And their results were inconclusive.
  • These results were similar to the immune response rates induced by concomitant administration of a single dose of Varicella Vaccine live (Oka/ Merck) and the measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine manufactured by Merck & Co., Inc. at separate injection sites.
  • For the eligible histology population, the efficacy results were similar.
  • The wounds on Ackerman were similar to those found on Gonzales.
  • The entry criteria were similar to those employed in PROWESS.
  • The mutational profiles were similar to those described for PI-experienced adults treated with fosamprenavir/ ritonavir.
  • The pharmacokinetics of efavirenz in paediatric patients were similar to adults.
  • Adverse events were similar to those seen at lower doses.
  • Sustained virological response rates in children and adolescents were similar to those in adults.
  • Serum concentration profiles were similar to those seen in adult rheumatoid arthritis patients.
  • Serum concentration profiles were similar to those seen in adult rheumatoid arthritis patients.
  • The subsidised activities were similar to those mentioned in Article 5 of the SME Regulation.
  • However, these prices were similar to the non-injurious price established for the Community industry.
  • The results were similar in the Commission survey where the staff did not have experience in dealing with OLAF and therefore could not form an opinion of its activities.
  • The results were similar with and without co-administration of thalidomide 200 mg/ day to steady-state levels.
  • The studies commissioned by PI and ABI followed similar methodologies, but their results were difficult to reconcile.
  • My brother's tears were similar to the tears of people who at that moment, lost their reason to live on.

Alternatives:

  • their results were similar to each other
  • their results were similar to the previous findings

This phrase is correct and commonly used to compare results to those observed in a specific study.

"their results were similar to those seen in this study"

This phrase is used to highlight the similarity between the results obtained and the results observed in a particular study.

Examples:

  • Their results were similar to those seen in this study, confirming the validity of the findings.
  • The results were similar to those seen in this study, indicating a consistent trend.

Alternatives:

  • their results were similar to the findings in this study
  • their results were similar to the results reported in this study

Related Comparisons

How TextRanch works

Fast and reliable proofreading, editing, and language advice tailored to your needs.

1. Choose Your Service

Quick Text Editing

  • Emails and short texts
  • Proofreading & editing
  • Ready in 5-10 minutes
SUBMIT YOUR TEXT NOW

Document Editing

  • Documents of any type (*.docx)
  • Advanced & Premium editing
  • Ready in as little as 4 hours
UPLOAD YOUR DOCUMENT

Ask an Editor

  • Personalized answers to your language questions
  • Expert guidance on grammar, style, and usage
  • Ready in 24 hours
ASK YOUR QUESTION

Upload your document or paste your text directly into our platform. Your text is reviewed and refined by our expert editors (real people, not machines) who understand the nuances of English. Expect corrections, improvements, and insightful suggestions that enhance the clarity, tone, and professionalism of your writing.

In just a few minutes (or hours for longer documents), you'll receive your corrected text. Review the changes, make any final adjustments, and confidently share your polished English with the world.
You can count on a personalized, friendly service every time you use TextRanch. We're committed to helping you make a great impression with every word you write.

We proofread and edit these types of texts and documents:

Short texts Business Emails Personal Emails Social media posts Resume and Curriculum Vitae Business documents Sales proposal Research and academic papers Thesis Dissertation Essays Articles Blog posts and much more....

Powered By Humans

TextRanch Editors

AI is a great tool, but when it comes to perfecting your writing, we rely on real human editors.

  • All our editors are native English speakers.
  • Each editor has passed a rigorous admission test to ensure quality.
  • Our global team is ready to correct any text, anytime.

MEET OUR EDITORS

TextRanch Editors

Why choose TextRanch?

Complete Privacy

Your texts are safe and secure with us. We never share your information with third parties.

Affordable Pricing

No subscription fees and rates up to 50% cheaper than other online editing services.

100% Satisfaction

We guarantee that you'll be satisfied with the quality of our service or your money back.

Top Customer Service

Our team is here to help you with any questions you may have. Contact us anytime.

Our Customers Love Us!

We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283125 votes, and

People Feedback 4.9 Excellent - Reviews 2.137

"7 years without any disappointment. Always 100% satisfied. You guys are the best in the world at what you do. Thank you so much :)"

Profile picture of Zubair from Bangladesh

Zubair
from Bangladesh From

"I wasn't aware of this service, it's fascinating and more reliable than standard IA tools available on the internet"

Profile picture of Arturo from Mexico

Arturo
from Mexico From

"In a world of text messages and online communication, this is great to have as a live tool. Thank you."

Profile picture of Selena from USA

Selena
from USA From

"Wow, it's just so excellent. I never would have believed I could have a sure and excellent English companion. Thanks, TextRanch."

Profile picture of Ifiok from Nigeria

Ifiok
from Nigeria From

"This is my first time using TextRanch, and I like how the editors take time to correct my text. To everyone who has never used TextRanch before, I highly recommend trying it."

Profile picture of Wilson from France

Wilson
from France From

"It is an amazing source of feedback because, as a non-native speaker, I really need to have a reliable helper correct my text."

Profile picture of Susan from Germany

Susan
from Germany From

Trusted by Hundreds Teams

Facebook logo
Accenture logo
Air Asia logo
AirBus logo
Amazon logo
Bayer logo
Decathlon logo
Docusign logo
Ebay logo
Fiverr logo
Fossil logo
Keller Williams logo
LinkedIn logo
Loreal logo
Motorola logo
Orange logo
Roche logo
Salesforce logo
Stellantis logo