the year 2003 vs the year of 2003

Both "the year 2003" and "the year of 2003" are correct, but they are used in slightly different contexts. "The year 2003" is more commonly used and concise, while "the year of 2003" is also correct but less common. The choice between them depends on the level of formality or personal preference.

Last updated: March 23, 2024 • 825 views

the year 2003

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

This phrase is a common way to refer to a specific year, such as 2003. It is concise and widely accepted in both spoken and written English.

Examples:

I graduated in the year 2003.
The movie was released in the year 2003.
The event took place in the year 2003.

Show examples from the web [+]

For the year 2003, EUR 560 millions is allocated to the beneficiary countries.
We believe that government debt in Ireland will be reduced to around 25% of GDP by the year 2003.
It is noted that restructuring expenses incurred by one of the sampled Community producers negatively affected the profitability for the year 2003.
Bulgaria committed itself, in the framework of the accession negotiations, to close Units 1 and 2 of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant before the year 2003.
The budget for the year 2003 amounted to EUR 9,5 million.
In February 2002, the Commission presented to Parliament the annual political strategy for the year 2003.
The budget for Civil Protection activities for the year 2003 is EUR 6,5 million.
First of all, the Network of Independent Experts on Fundamental Rights has just completed its report for the year 2003.
Today we are examining the report for the year 2003, upon which Mr De Rossa has spoken on behalf of our committee.
These costs can vary, as has been shown with regard to the year 2003.
These rates are shown in Table 1 above for the year 2003.
The periods quoted here, namely until the year 2003, are much too long.
If the South African side proposes meaningful market openings to the EU, we will be able to fully eliminate our tariffs by the year 2003.
(6) Pending the signature and the entry into force of the new agreement, quantitative limits for the year 2003 must be established.
Taking into account both types of budget lines, the average payment delay for DG DEV for the year 2003 is 32,13 days.
The guidelines in these proposals will enable the creation of nearly 12 million jobs by the year 2003 and bring the rate of unemployment down from 10.6 % to 7 %.
In this connection, I am pleased that my city, Graz, was recently selected as the European City of Culture for the year 2003.
Member States shall compile the data specified in this Regulation for the first time for the year 2003 and for each year thereafter until 2009.
Member States shall compile on an annual basis the data specified in the Annex to this Regulation for the first time for the year 2003 and for each year thereafter until 2009.
From a procedural point of view, Member States wishing to receive a financial contribution have to present to the Commission a plan of their proposed decommissioning expenditure for the year 2003.

Alternatives:

the year 2022
the year 1999
the year 2010
the year 1985
the year 1776

the year of 2003

This phrase is correct but less common in English.

This phrase is also correct and can be used to specify a particular year, like 2003. It is slightly more formal or can be used for emphasis, but it is less commonly used than "the year 2003."