the woods was vs the woods were

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'The woods were' is the correct phrase when referring to a plural subject like 'woods.' 'The woods was' would be incorrect because 'woods' is a plural noun and requires a plural verb like 'were.'

Last updated: March 19, 2024 • 2939 views

This phrase is incorrect. 'Woods' is a plural noun and requires a plural verb.

"the woods was"

Incorrect - 'woods' is a plural noun, so it should be followed by a plural verb like 'were.'

Show examples from the web [+]

Into The Woods Was Almost A 'Disaster,' According To Emily Blunt image. Once upon a time, in a far-off place, an ensemble of some of Hollywood's most ...
Marshall firmly believed that Into the Woods was “a fairy tale for the post-9/11 generation". In January 2012, Marshall approached Walt Disney Pictures—for ...
March 30, 2010. Retrieved January 18, 2015. Jump up ^ Bloom, Ester (January 2, 2015). "Before Into The Woods Was A Disney Movie, It Was An AIDS Parable".
Into The Woods was not one of those good stories. First off, the story starts off with an incredibly repetitive and rather annoying song which is supposed to ...

Alternatives:

the woods were
the forest was
the trees were
the woodland was
the grove was

This phrase is correct and commonly used when referring to a plural subject like 'woods.'

"the woods were"

Correct - 'woods' is a plural noun, so it should be followed by a plural verb like 'were.'

Show examples from the web [+]

To ask other readers questions about The Woods Were Full Of Men, please sign up. Be the first to ask a question about The Woods Were Full Of Men ...
The Woods Were Never Quiet: Stories by Monique Wentzel. Wentzel-book-2WEB . 2014. BCC publication number 232. Click here to view the prospectus.
According to Anna Kendrick, the set pieces used for the woods were so big and realistic that she and Chris Pine actually got lost while on the sound stage and ...
Dec 8, 2015 ... The Woods Were Full Of Them. Giannis manos. SubscribeSubscribed Unsubscribe 112112. Loading... Loading... Working... Add to ...

Alternatives:

the forest was
the trees were
the woodland was
the grove was
the jungle was

How TextRanch works

Fast and reliable proofreading, editing, and language advice tailored to your needs.

1. Choose Your Service

Quick Text Editing

Emails and short texts
Proofreading & editing
Ready in 5-10 minutes

SUBMIT YOUR TEXT NOW

Document Editing

Documents of any type (*.docx)
Advanced & Premium editing
Ready in as little as 4 hours

UPLOAD YOUR DOCUMENT

Ask an Editor

Personalized answers to your language questions
Expert guidance on grammar, style, and usage
Ready in 24 hours

ASK YOUR QUESTION

Upload your document or paste your text directly into our platform. Your text is reviewed and refined by our expert editors (real people, not machines) who understand the nuances of English. Expect corrections, improvements, and insightful suggestions that enhance the clarity, tone, and professionalism of your writing.

3. Receive Your Polished Text

In just a few minutes (or hours for longer documents), you'll receive your corrected text. Review the changes, make any final adjustments, and confidently share your polished English with the world.
You can count on a personalized, friendly service every time you use TextRanch. We're committed to helping you make a great impression with every word you write.

We proofread and edit these types of texts and documents:

Short texts Business Emails Personal Emails Social media posts Resume and Curriculum Vitae Business documents Sales proposal Research and academic papers Thesis Dissertation Essays Articles Blog posts and much more....

Why choose TextRanch?

Complete Privacy

Your texts are safe and secure with us. We never share your information with third parties.

Affordable Pricing

No subscription fees and rates up to 50% cheaper than other online editing services.

100% Satisfaction

We guarantee that you'll be satisfied with the quality of our service or your money back.

Top Customer Service

Our team is here to help you with any questions you may have. Contact us anytime.

Our Customers Love Us!

We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283125 votes, and

4.9 Excellent - Reviews 2.137

"7 years without any disappointment. Always 100% satisfied. You guys are the best in the world at what you do. Thank you so much :)"

Zubair
from Bangladesh

"I wasn't aware of this service, it's fascinating and more reliable than standard IA tools available on the internet"

Arturo
from Mexico

"In a world of text messages and online communication, this is great to have as a live tool. Thank you."

Selena
from USA

"Wow, it's just so excellent. I never would have believed I could have a sure and excellent English companion. Thanks, TextRanch."

Ifiok
from Nigeria

"This is my first time using TextRanch, and I like how the editors take time to correct my text. To everyone who has never used TextRanch before, I highly recommend trying it."

Wilson
from France

"It is an amazing source of feedback because, as a non-native speaker, I really need to have a reliable helper correct my text."

Susan
from Germany

the woods was vs the woods were

"the woods was"

"the woods were"

Related Comparisons

2. Submit Your Text

3. Receive Your Polished Text