⚡ Black Friday Offer: Click here and shop now!

TextRanch

The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

the vessels were in site vs the vessels were on site

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'The vessels were in site' implies that the vessels were physically inside a specific location or area. On the other hand, 'the vessels were on site' suggests that the vessels were at a particular location or construction site.

Last updated: March 26, 2024 • 428 views

the vessels were in site

This phrase is correct but less common in English. It implies that the vessels were physically inside a specific location or area.

This phrase is used to indicate that the vessels were located within a particular site or area. It is less commonly used compared to 'on site.'
  • Vessel puncture site haematoma Puncture site haemorrhage
  • At last, in Mr Teverson's report, we have this very proposal that was envisaged from the word 'go', namely that inspectors will have the right to make observation visits without notice to vessels, sites, documents, to every aspect.
  • Dizziness Numbness and tingling Problems with sense of taste Nausea (feeling sick) Widening of blood vessels Injection site pain Injection site reaction
  • Headache Dizziness Numbness and tingling Problems with sense of taste Nausea (feeling sick) Widening of blood vessels Injection site pain Injection site reaction
  • They will be modified only if the vessel were to touch land on third-country territory.
  • Temperatures on the vessels were between 40 º and 45 º and there was no ventilation.
  • septic inflammation of a vein with blood clotting (septic thrombophlebitis) or blocked blood vessels at an infected site
  • The sanctions were lifted, without any requirement for the flag States to demonstrate that the vessels were operating according to ICCAT rules.
  • In certain cases, the vessels were able to be relocated to other fishing grounds, fishing less than they fished in Moroccan grounds and, therefore, losing income.
  • In fact I do not believe that the vessels which arrived in the Black Sea were an appropriate response, as some of these vessels were carrying missiles.
  • This seizure of Italian fishing vessels reflects Libyan sovereignty claims over the waters in which the vessels were fishing and it obviously constitutes a cause for concern for the European Commission.
  • Aboard the vessel were 21 individuals, all unarmed civilians, of various nationalities: they included the Irish Liberal peace prize winner, Mairead Maguire and the former US Congress woman Cynthia McKinney, both of whom have already been deported.
  • When the Israelis did respond they stated that those aboard the vessel were terrorists and that they would shoot at the Dignity.
  • Despite being on their way home and with their catch already stowed, the vessels were seized on the grounds of having allegedly fished in 'prohibited waters'.
  • Within ICCAT, while some import bans remain in place the general trend has been for countries which were sanctioned to join the RFMO, claim that the vessels were legitimate, and thus avoid the sanctions.
  • If instead the vessels were compelled to bear their own costs, the pressure on fisheries would be reduced and both the taxpayers and the environment would be the winners.
  • It appears from the reports and images in circulation that the vessels were attacked with water cannon, and those on board were threatened at gunpoint, forced off their ships and placed under arrest by the Israeli forces.
  • Italy claims that the contracts for the four vessels were signed on 28 January 2005, for the vessels to be delivered before 28 January 2008.
  • The reasons invoked by Member States were that there were no appropriate vessels available among the vessels to be decommissioned, that decommissioning was not foreseen or that the incentives provided for the transfer of vessels were not sufficiently attractive.
  • The vessels were delivered, or are expected to be delivered, at the following dates:

Alternatives:

  • the vessels were inside the site
  • the vessels were within the site

the vessels were on site

This phrase is commonly used in English to indicate that the vessels were at a particular location or construction site.

This phrase is used to convey that the vessels were present at a specific location or construction site. It is a common expression in English.
  • Vessel puncture site haematoma Puncture site haemorrhage
  • At last, in Mr Teverson's report, we have this very proposal that was envisaged from the word 'go', namely that inspectors will have the right to make observation visits without notice to vessels, sites, documents, to every aspect.
  • Dizziness Numbness and tingling Problems with sense of taste Nausea (feeling sick) Widening of blood vessels Injection site pain Injection site reaction
  • Headache Dizziness Numbness and tingling Problems with sense of taste Nausea (feeling sick) Widening of blood vessels Injection site pain Injection site reaction
  • They will be modified only if the vessel were to touch land on third-country territory.
  • Temperatures on the vessels were between 40 º and 45 º and there was no ventilation.
  • septic inflammation of a vein with blood clotting (septic thrombophlebitis) or blocked blood vessels at an infected site
  • The sanctions were lifted, without any requirement for the flag States to demonstrate that the vessels were operating according to ICCAT rules.
  • In certain cases, the vessels were able to be relocated to other fishing grounds, fishing less than they fished in Moroccan grounds and, therefore, losing income.
  • In fact I do not believe that the vessels which arrived in the Black Sea were an appropriate response, as some of these vessels were carrying missiles.
  • This seizure of Italian fishing vessels reflects Libyan sovereignty claims over the waters in which the vessels were fishing and it obviously constitutes a cause for concern for the European Commission.
  • Aboard the vessel were 21 individuals, all unarmed civilians, of various nationalities: they included the Irish Liberal peace prize winner, Mairead Maguire and the former US Congress woman Cynthia McKinney, both of whom have already been deported.
  • When the Israelis did respond they stated that those aboard the vessel were terrorists and that they would shoot at the Dignity.
  • Despite being on their way home and with their catch already stowed, the vessels were seized on the grounds of having allegedly fished in 'prohibited waters'.
  • Within ICCAT, while some import bans remain in place the general trend has been for countries which were sanctioned to join the RFMO, claim that the vessels were legitimate, and thus avoid the sanctions.
  • If instead the vessels were compelled to bear their own costs, the pressure on fisheries would be reduced and both the taxpayers and the environment would be the winners.
  • It appears from the reports and images in circulation that the vessels were attacked with water cannon, and those on board were threatened at gunpoint, forced off their ships and placed under arrest by the Israeli forces.
  • Italy claims that the contracts for the four vessels were signed on 28 January 2005, for the vessels to be delivered before 28 January 2008.
  • The reasons invoked by Member States were that there were no appropriate vessels available among the vessels to be decommissioned, that decommissioning was not foreseen or that the incentives provided for the transfer of vessels were not sufficiently attractive.
  • The vessels were delivered, or are expected to be delivered, at the following dates:

Alternatives:

  • the vessels were at the site
  • the vessels were located on the site

Related Comparisons

on the project site vs in the project site the ships were in site vs the ships were on site in the site vs at the site in the site vs on the site

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9TextRanch on TrustPilot).

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!

×

⚡️ Black Friday 2024 ⚡️

Stock up on credits for the entire year!

Grab this offer now!