the vessels were in site vs the vessels were on site

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'The vessels were in site' implies that the vessels were physically inside a specific location or area. On the other hand, 'the vessels were on site' suggests that the vessels were at a particular location or construction site.

Last updated: March 26, 2024 • 527 views

This phrase is correct but less common in English. It implies that the vessels were physically inside a specific location or area.

"the vessels were in site"

This phrase is used to indicate that the vessels were located within a particular site or area. It is less commonly used compared to 'on site.'

Show examples from the web [+]

Vessel puncture site haematoma Puncture site haemorrhage
At last, in Mr Teverson's report, we have this very proposal that was envisaged from the word 'go', namely that inspectors will have the right to make observation visits without notice to vessels, sites, documents, to every aspect.
Dizziness Numbness and tingling Problems with sense of taste Nausea (feeling sick) Widening of blood vessels Injection site pain Injection site reaction
Headache Dizziness Numbness and tingling Problems with sense of taste Nausea (feeling sick) Widening of blood vessels Injection site pain Injection site reaction
They will be modified only if the vessel were to touch land on third-country territory.
Temperatures on the vessels were between 40 º and 45 º and there was no ventilation.
septic inflammation of a vein with blood clotting (septic thrombophlebitis) or blocked blood vessels at an infected site
The sanctions were lifted, without any requirement for the flag States to demonstrate that the vessels were operating according to ICCAT rules.
In certain cases, the vessels were able to be relocated to other fishing grounds, fishing less than they fished in Moroccan grounds and, therefore, losing income.
In fact I do not believe that the vessels which arrived in the Black Sea were an appropriate response, as some of these vessels were carrying missiles.
This seizure of Italian fishing vessels reflects Libyan sovereignty claims over the waters in which the vessels were fishing and it obviously constitutes a cause for concern for the European Commission.
Aboard the vessel were 21 individuals, all unarmed civilians, of various nationalities: they included the Irish Liberal peace prize winner, Mairead Maguire and the former US Congress woman Cynthia McKinney, both of whom have already been deported.
When the Israelis did respond they stated that those aboard the vessel were terrorists and that they would shoot at the Dignity.
Despite being on their way home and with their catch already stowed, the vessels were seized on the grounds of having allegedly fished in 'prohibited waters'.
Within ICCAT, while some import bans remain in place the general trend has been for countries which were sanctioned to join the RFMO, claim that the vessels were legitimate, and thus avoid the sanctions.
If instead the vessels were compelled to bear their own costs, the pressure on fisheries would be reduced and both the taxpayers and the environment would be the winners.
It appears from the reports and images in circulation that the vessels were attacked with water cannon, and those on board were threatened at gunpoint, forced off their ships and placed under arrest by the Israeli forces.
Italy claims that the contracts for the four vessels were signed on 28 January 2005, for the vessels to be delivered before 28 January 2008.
The reasons invoked by Member States were that there were no appropriate vessels available among the vessels to be decommissioned, that decommissioning was not foreseen or that the incentives provided for the transfer of vessels were not sufficiently attractive.
The vessels were delivered, or are expected to be delivered, at the following dates:

Alternatives:

the vessels were inside the site
the vessels were within the site

This phrase is commonly used in English to indicate that the vessels were at a particular location or construction site.

"the vessels were on site"

This phrase is used to convey that the vessels were present at a specific location or construction site. It is a common expression in English.

Show examples from the web [+]

Vessel puncture site haematoma Puncture site haemorrhage
At last, in Mr Teverson's report, we have this very proposal that was envisaged from the word 'go', namely that inspectors will have the right to make observation visits without notice to vessels, sites, documents, to every aspect.
Dizziness Numbness and tingling Problems with sense of taste Nausea (feeling sick) Widening of blood vessels Injection site pain Injection site reaction
Headache Dizziness Numbness and tingling Problems with sense of taste Nausea (feeling sick) Widening of blood vessels Injection site pain Injection site reaction
They will be modified only if the vessel were to touch land on third-country territory.
Temperatures on the vessels were between 40 º and 45 º and there was no ventilation.
septic inflammation of a vein with blood clotting (septic thrombophlebitis) or blocked blood vessels at an infected site
The sanctions were lifted, without any requirement for the flag States to demonstrate that the vessels were operating according to ICCAT rules.
In certain cases, the vessels were able to be relocated to other fishing grounds, fishing less than they fished in Moroccan grounds and, therefore, losing income.
In fact I do not believe that the vessels which arrived in the Black Sea were an appropriate response, as some of these vessels were carrying missiles.
This seizure of Italian fishing vessels reflects Libyan sovereignty claims over the waters in which the vessels were fishing and it obviously constitutes a cause for concern for the European Commission.
Aboard the vessel were 21 individuals, all unarmed civilians, of various nationalities: they included the Irish Liberal peace prize winner, Mairead Maguire and the former US Congress woman Cynthia McKinney, both of whom have already been deported.
When the Israelis did respond they stated that those aboard the vessel were terrorists and that they would shoot at the Dignity.
Despite being on their way home and with their catch already stowed, the vessels were seized on the grounds of having allegedly fished in 'prohibited waters'.
Within ICCAT, while some import bans remain in place the general trend has been for countries which were sanctioned to join the RFMO, claim that the vessels were legitimate, and thus avoid the sanctions.
If instead the vessels were compelled to bear their own costs, the pressure on fisheries would be reduced and both the taxpayers and the environment would be the winners.
It appears from the reports and images in circulation that the vessels were attacked with water cannon, and those on board were threatened at gunpoint, forced off their ships and placed under arrest by the Israeli forces.
Italy claims that the contracts for the four vessels were signed on 28 January 2005, for the vessels to be delivered before 28 January 2008.
The reasons invoked by Member States were that there were no appropriate vessels available among the vessels to be decommissioned, that decommissioning was not foreseen or that the incentives provided for the transfer of vessels were not sufficiently attractive.
The vessels were delivered, or are expected to be delivered, at the following dates:

Alternatives:

the vessels were at the site
the vessels were located on the site

How TextRanch works

Fast and reliable proofreading, editing, and language advice tailored to your needs.

1. Choose Your Service

Quick Text Editing

Emails and short texts
Proofreading & editing
Ready in 5-10 minutes

SUBMIT YOUR TEXT NOW

Document Editing

Documents of any type (*.docx)
Advanced & Premium editing
Ready in as little as 4 hours

UPLOAD YOUR DOCUMENT

Ask an Editor

Personalized answers to your language questions
Expert guidance on grammar, style, and usage
Ready in 24 hours

ASK YOUR QUESTION

Upload your document or paste your text directly into our platform. Your text is reviewed and refined by our expert editors (real people, not machines) who understand the nuances of English. Expect corrections, improvements, and insightful suggestions that enhance the clarity, tone, and professionalism of your writing.

3. Receive Your Polished Text

In just a few minutes (or hours for longer documents), you'll receive your corrected text. Review the changes, make any final adjustments, and confidently share your polished English with the world.
You can count on a personalized, friendly service every time you use TextRanch. We're committed to helping you make a great impression with every word you write.

We proofread and edit these types of texts and documents:

Short texts Business Emails Personal Emails Social media posts Resume and Curriculum Vitae Business documents Sales proposal Research and academic papers Thesis Dissertation Essays Articles Blog posts and much more....

Our Customers Love Us!

We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283125 votes, and

4.9 Excellent - Reviews 2.137

"7 years without any disappointment. Always 100% satisfied. You guys are the best in the world at what you do. Thank you so much :)"

Zubair
from Bangladesh

"I wasn't aware of this service, it's fascinating and more reliable than standard IA tools available on the internet"

Arturo
from Mexico

"In a world of text messages and online communication, this is great to have as a live tool. Thank you."

Selena
from USA

"Wow, it's just so excellent. I never would have believed I could have a sure and excellent English companion. Thanks, TextRanch."

Ifiok
from Nigeria

"This is my first time using TextRanch, and I like how the editors take time to correct my text. To everyone who has never used TextRanch before, I highly recommend trying it."

Wilson
from France

"It is an amazing source of feedback because, as a non-native speaker, I really need to have a reliable helper correct my text."

Susan
from Germany

the vessels were in site vs the vessels were on site