The text would be Imprinted behind the logo vs The text would be Imprint behind The logo

The correct phrase is 'the text would be imprinted behind the logo'. 'Imprinted' is the correct past participle form of the verb 'imprint' in this context.

Last updated: March 29, 2024 • 675 views

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

"The text would be Imprinted behind the logo"

This phrase is used to describe the action of placing or engraving text behind a logo.

Show examples from the web [+]

Stacey would be imprinted to me right now like a werewolf.
You said the text would be aligned but I am not sure with what.
The meaning of the text would not be changed as a consequence and it would mean that the text would no longer be subject to mediocre and nauseating exploitation.
We are prepared to withdraw it, and the text would then be worded in accordance with Mr Oostlander's oral formulation.
The text would certainly need to be re-written on certain points and this would open Pandora's box.
The text would thus not really provide a 'solution' to the legal questions at stake.
Except for the part dealing with cloned meat and a few other foodstuffs, the text would have been adopted by a very large majority.
Similarly, the rules contained in the text would enable consumer rights to be strengthened with regard to information and delivery.
Rejecting the text would simply produce what the US industry and many of those responsible in the European Union have long desired: no labelling at all.
The text would then read as follows:
The text would therefore read as follows: 'state aid rules to measures taken and their conformity with the Treaty provisions'.
The remainder of the text would remain the same.
Changing the text would be disrespectful towards almost half the population of the European Union, who have already ratified it.
I note in particular that when you talk about the international law with which the text would not be compatible, you are referring in fact to the rules of the World Trade Organisation.
The text would be improved if it were amended to make that clear, perhaps this can be done when it is proof-read.
The text would read thus: 'the defence of the interests of indigenous populations and of minorities such as the mountain people of Vietnam, victims of systematic repression.
Let me repeat, however, that if we had from the outset insisted that the Charter must be binding, then the text would have been disappointing.
The Commission accepts them, with the exception of Amendments Nos 27 and 30, where the attempt to simplify the text would detract from the meaning.
The text would then be worded as follows: "Calls on the Member States, in close collaboration with the Commission services, to initiate a qualitative and quantitative revision".
Our failure to agree this crucial part of the text would leave disabled people quite literally falling through the crack, a crack for which we would ourselves be responsible.

This phrase is incorrect. 'Imprint' should be in the past participle form 'imprinted' in this context.

"The text would be Imprint behind The logo"

Show examples from the web [+]

You said the text would be aligned but I am not sure with what.
The meaning of the text would not be changed as a consequence and it would mean that the text would no longer be subject to mediocre and nauseating exploitation.
We are prepared to withdraw it, and the text would then be worded in accordance with Mr Oostlander's oral formulation.
The text would certainly need to be re-written on certain points and this would open Pandora's box.
The text would thus not really provide a 'solution' to the legal questions at stake.
Except for the part dealing with cloned meat and a few other foodstuffs, the text would have been adopted by a very large majority.
Similarly, the rules contained in the text would enable consumer rights to be strengthened with regard to information and delivery.
Rejecting the text would simply produce what the US industry and many of those responsible in the European Union have long desired: no labelling at all.
The text would then read as follows:
The text would therefore read as follows: 'state aid rules to measures taken and their conformity with the Treaty provisions'.
The remainder of the text would remain the same.
Changing the text would be disrespectful towards almost half the population of the European Union, who have already ratified it.
I note in particular that when you talk about the international law with which the text would not be compatible, you are referring in fact to the rules of the World Trade Organisation.
The text would be improved if it were amended to make that clear, perhaps this can be done when it is proof-read.
The text would read thus: 'the defence of the interests of indigenous populations and of minorities such as the mountain people of Vietnam, victims of systematic repression.
Let me repeat, however, that if we had from the outset insisted that the Charter must be binding, then the text would have been disappointing.
The Commission accepts them, with the exception of Amendments Nos 27 and 30, where the attempt to simplify the text would detract from the meaning.
The text would then be worded as follows: "Calls on the Member States, in close collaboration with the Commission services, to initiate a qualitative and quantitative revision".
Our failure to agree this crucial part of the text would leave disabled people quite literally falling through the crack, a crack for which we would ourselves be responsible.
The text would then read: 'calls for the recommendations and related observations to be included in EU dialogues with both sides, as well as in multilateral fora'.

How TextRanch works

Fast and reliable proofreading, editing, and language advice tailored to your needs.

1. Choose Your Service

Quick Text Editing

Emails and short texts
Proofreading & editing
Ready in 5-10 minutes

SUBMIT YOUR TEXT NOW

Document Editing

Documents of any type (*.docx)
Advanced & Premium editing
Ready in as little as 4 hours

UPLOAD YOUR DOCUMENT

Ask an Editor

Personalized answers to your language questions
Expert guidance on grammar, style, and usage
Ready in 24 hours

ASK YOUR QUESTION

Upload your document or paste your text directly into our platform. Your text is reviewed and refined by our expert editors (real people, not machines) who understand the nuances of English. Expect corrections, improvements, and insightful suggestions that enhance the clarity, tone, and professionalism of your writing.

3. Receive Your Polished Text

In just a few minutes (or hours for longer documents), you'll receive your corrected text. Review the changes, make any final adjustments, and confidently share your polished English with the world.
You can count on a personalized, friendly service every time you use TextRanch. We're committed to helping you make a great impression with every word you write.

We proofread and edit these types of texts and documents:

Short texts Business Emails Personal Emails Social media posts Resume and Curriculum Vitae Business documents Sales proposal Research and academic papers Thesis Dissertation Essays Articles Blog posts and much more....

Our Customers Love Us!

We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283125 votes, and

4.9 Excellent - Reviews 2.137

"7 years without any disappointment. Always 100% satisfied. You guys are the best in the world at what you do. Thank you so much :)"

Zubair
from Bangladesh

"I wasn't aware of this service, it's fascinating and more reliable than standard IA tools available on the internet"

Arturo
from Mexico

"In a world of text messages and online communication, this is great to have as a live tool. Thank you."

Selena
from USA

"Wow, it's just so excellent. I never would have believed I could have a sure and excellent English companion. Thanks, TextRanch."

Ifiok
from Nigeria

"This is my first time using TextRanch, and I like how the editors take time to correct my text. To everyone who has never used TextRanch before, I highly recommend trying it."

Wilson
from France

"It is an amazing source of feedback because, as a non-native speaker, I really need to have a reliable helper correct my text."

Susan
from Germany

The text would be Imprinted behind the logo vs The text would be Imprint behind The logo