TextRanch

The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

the study brings new information vs the study is not original

These two phrases are not directly comparable as they convey different meanings. 'The study brings new information' implies that the study has introduced new knowledge, while 'The study is not original' suggests that the study lacks originality. They are used in different contexts and cannot be interchanged.

Last updated: March 22, 2024

the study brings new information

This phrase is correct and commonly used to indicate that a study has introduced new knowledge or insights.

This phrase is used to highlight the fact that a study has provided fresh or previously unknown information.

Examples:

  • The study brings new information to light.
  • Her research brings new information to the field.
  • I can asure you that not a week goes by that I don't bring new information and reports to the president.
  • Any new information which may come to light from the studies or from other sources will be fully considered.
  • The EU Scientific Committee on Veterinary Measures relating to Public Health was asked to review its previous opinions of April 1999 and May 2000 in the light of any new information, including the results of the studies launched by the Commission.
  • Solidarity - This unprecedented enlargement brings new challenges for the Union.
  • Which would allow new information to be retained.
  • The cost of providing new information should not be disproportionate.
  • He brings news from General George Washington.
  • That every hour brings new things.
  • I bring news on our walnut shells.
  • But they almost always bring new surprises.
  • Because women bring new life into the world.
  • It brings new wishes for the new year.
  • - To everything - all of it, before they bring new charges.
  • That of course also brings new challenges for our health and social systems.
  • We can all bet on the fact that the future will bring new crises.
  • I hope that these elections will bring new stability to Ukraine.
  • Secondly, 2009 brings new challenges, which no-one is questioning.
  • Accelerated globalisation is creating changes in financial products and markets that bring new challenges.
  • We should also bring new ideas for mutually beneficial cooperation.
  • Young workers bring new reserves of knowledge, skills and experience to the EU labour market.

Alternatives:

  • The study provides new insights
  • The study reveals new findings
  • The study uncovers new data
  • The study presents new knowledge
  • The study offers fresh perspectives

the study is not original

This phrase is correct and is used to convey that a study lacks originality or uniqueness.

This phrase is employed when describing a study that does not present new or innovative ideas, concepts, or approaches.

Examples:

  • The study is not original and simply repeats existing research.
  • His work is not original; it merely replicates previous studies.
  • The study takes both the original payment and the change rendered into account.
  • A copycat studies the original unsub in order to learn.
  • In the second year of the study women in the original Preotact group were randomly assigned to receive either alendronate or matching placebo, and women in the other two groups received alendronate.
  • A historical evaluation is required as there seems to be evidence that original studies did not prove the safety of aspartame.
  • Charlene McGee wasn't part of the original study?
  • All across Europe, the Americas and around the world historical European fight clubs have emerged with the desire to study the original combative systems of both Europe and the ancient world.
  • The authorities submitted to the Commission, as supplementary information, a complete set of documents and studies concerning the original project and its likely effects on natural values.
  • In the original clinical studies (Phase II/III), adverse events with possible, probable or unknown relationship to ritonavir were reported in >= 2% of 1033 patients.
  • In the original clinical studies (Phase II/III), adverse events with possible, probable or unknown relationship to ritonavir were reported in >= 2% of 1033 patients.
  • The application dossier shall include all the available data relevant for the purpose of the risk assessment (i.e. full published papers of all references cited or full copies of the original unpublished studies).
  • when a procuring entity procures prototypes or a first product or service which are developed at its request in the course of, and for, a particular contract for research, experiment, study or original development;
  • where a procuring entity procures a prototype or a first good or service that is developed at its request in the course of, and for, a particular contract for research, experiment, study or original development;
  • (x) confirmation that the registrant is the owner of all original studies from which study summaries or robust study summaries are derived and submitted, or has the written consent of the owner(s) of the original studies to refer to them;
  • The study is ongoing. national competent authorities are involved in the study.
  • The relevance of the study is underlined in the amendment tabled to recital 4.
  • The study is evolving, as these things do.
  • Her work on the study is time-consuming.
  • The study is showing no sign of arrhythmia.
  • No information on the severity of the relapses before inclusion of patients in the study is available.
  • The primary efficacy endpoint of the study is progression-free survival.

Alternatives:

  • The study lacks originality
  • The study is unoriginal
  • The study is derivative
  • The study is uninspired
  • The study is a rehash of existing research

Related Comparisons

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9TextRanch on TrustPilot).

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!