The right to elect vs the right to vote

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in slightly different contexts. 'The right to elect' refers to the ability to choose someone for a specific position or role, while 'the right to vote' is more general and refers to the act of casting a ballot in an election. The choice between the two depends on the specific context and the emphasis you want to convey.

Last updated: March 15, 2024 • 737 views

This phrase is correct but less commonly used than 'the right to vote'. It refers to the ability to choose someone for a specific position or role.

"The right to elect"

This phrase is used when emphasizing the act of choosing or selecting a candidate for a particular position or role.

Examples:

Citizens have the right to elect their representatives in a democratic society.
The committee has the right to elect a new chairperson.
The shareholders have the right to elect the board of directors.

Show examples from the web [+]

Statutes establish different conditions and qualifications under which a spouse may claim the right to elect against the will; these range from estate and gift tax ...
The right to elect and to be elected. 33. The legal framework should ensure that all eligible citizens are guaranteed the right to universal and equal suffrage as ...
... Chapter 2106. of the Revised Code, including, after the probate of a will, the right to elect to take under the will or under section 2105.06 of the Revised Code.
After being notified of a divorce, the plan administrator must give notice, generally within 14 days, to the qualified beneficiary of the right to elect COBRA ...

Alternatives:

the right to vote
the right to choose
the right to select
the right to appoint
the right to designate

This phrase is commonly used and refers to the fundamental right to participate in an election by casting a ballot.

"the right to vote"

This phrase is used when referring to the act of voting in an election to choose a candidate or decide on an issue.

Examples:

Every citizen has the right to vote in free and fair elections.
The right to vote is a cornerstone of democracy.
People fought for the right to vote for centuries.

Show examples from the web [+]

Only Parties have the right to vote.
Of course, but without the right to vote.
They even have the right to vote now.
UK citizens, for example, lose the right to vote in UK elections after 15 years abroad.
Alternates shall not have the right to vote unless the member is absent.
He shall not have the right to vote.
The representative shall participate fully without the right to vote.
The second aspect provokes the same criticism as formulated above with respect to the right to vote.
However, these unions shall not have the right to vote.
Parliament's argument concerning the right to vote in European elections is, I feel, completely relevant.
The Administrative Board shall take its decisions by a two-thirds majority of all members with the right to vote.
Unless otherwise provided, the Management Board shall act by a majority of its members with the right to vote.
When accompanying a member, the alternate ║ shall attend without having the right to vote.
The Administrative Board shall take its decision by a four-fifths majority of all members with the right to vote.
Let's make it 1920 in honor of the year women won the right to vote.
We, as Americans, decided that of course women should have the right to vote.
Twenty-four of the 60 seats are directly elected on the basis of universal suffrage, where three million Hong Kong citizens have the right to vote.
Member States' exclusion of this small territory from the right to vote reflects no credit on them.
Norway shall be represented in the Management Board of the Support Office as an observer without the right to vote.
Observers may participate without the right to vote in the public sessions of the Assembly and its subsidiary organs.

Alternatives:

the right to elect
the right to choose
the right to select
the right to appoint
the right to designate

How TextRanch works

Fast and reliable proofreading, editing, and language advice tailored to your needs.

1. Choose Your Service

Quick Text Editing

Emails and short texts
Proofreading & editing
Ready in 5-10 minutes

SUBMIT YOUR TEXT NOW

Document Editing

Documents of any type (*.docx)
Advanced & Premium editing
Ready in as little as 4 hours

UPLOAD YOUR DOCUMENT

Ask an Editor

Personalized answers to your language questions
Expert guidance on grammar, style, and usage
Ready in 24 hours

ASK YOUR QUESTION

Upload your document or paste your text directly into our platform. Your text is reviewed and refined by our expert editors (real people, not machines) who understand the nuances of English. Expect corrections, improvements, and insightful suggestions that enhance the clarity, tone, and professionalism of your writing.

3. Receive Your Polished Text

In just a few minutes (or hours for longer documents), you'll receive your corrected text. Review the changes, make any final adjustments, and confidently share your polished English with the world.
You can count on a personalized, friendly service every time you use TextRanch. We're committed to helping you make a great impression with every word you write.

We proofread and edit these types of texts and documents:

Short texts Business Emails Personal Emails Social media posts Resume and Curriculum Vitae Business documents Sales proposal Research and academic papers Thesis Dissertation Essays Articles Blog posts and much more....

Why choose TextRanch?

Complete Privacy

Your texts are safe and secure with us. We never share your information with third parties.

Affordable Pricing

No subscription fees and rates up to 50% cheaper than other online editing services.

100% Satisfaction

We guarantee that you'll be satisfied with the quality of our service or your money back.

Top Customer Service

Our team is here to help you with any questions you may have. Contact us anytime.

Our Customers Love Us!

We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283125 votes, and

4.9 Excellent - Reviews 2.137

"7 years without any disappointment. Always 100% satisfied. You guys are the best in the world at what you do. Thank you so much :)"

Zubair
from Bangladesh

"I wasn't aware of this service, it's fascinating and more reliable than standard IA tools available on the internet"

Arturo
from Mexico

"In a world of text messages and online communication, this is great to have as a live tool. Thank you."

Selena
from USA

"Wow, it's just so excellent. I never would have believed I could have a sure and excellent English companion. Thanks, TextRanch."

Ifiok
from Nigeria

"This is my first time using TextRanch, and I like how the editors take time to correct my text. To everyone who has never used TextRanch before, I highly recommend trying it."

Wilson
from France

"It is an amazing source of feedback because, as a non-native speaker, I really need to have a reliable helper correct my text."

Susan
from Germany

The right to elect vs the right to vote