🎁 A holiday package to celebrate the season! Click here and shop now!

TextRanch

The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

the results shown in vs the results showed in

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'The results shown in' is used when referring to results that are currently being displayed or presented, while 'the results showed in' is used when referring to results that were displayed or presented in the past.

Last updated: March 26, 2024 • 1717 views

the results shown in

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

This phrase is used when referring to results that are currently being displayed or presented.
  • (89) The further investigation also uncovered certain variations in the level of exports of the Community industry and led to the results shown in the table above.
  • The further investigation also uncovered certain variations in the level of exports of the Community industry and led to the results shown in the table above.
  • The results are shown in Table 7.
  • The results are shown in table 1.
  • The results are shown in the figure below.
  • To set the base that results are shown in change the result format.
  • The indexed results are shown in the following table [70].
  • A summary of the key study results is shown in Table 2.
  • The main results are shown in the table in Annex which is sent directly to the Honourable Member and to Parliament's Secretariat.
  • To select the results that will be shown in the graphic, use the different check boxes located under the graph.
  • The results are shown in the table below and further confirm prices above a market benchmark in 2010 and 2011 for the two suppliers:
  • So a roll-call vote was held, the result of which is shown in the report, that is to say the exact number of honourable Members voting for, against or abstaining.
  • 1. The institutions shall make back-payments in the event of an increase in remuneration as a result of the weightings shown in the Annex.
  • The institutions shall make back-payments in the event of an increase in remuneration as a result of the weightings shown in the Annex.
  • The institutions shall make back-payments in the event of increases in remuneration as a result of the weightings shown in the Annex.
  • (94) The Commission examined the average cost of wages per employee for the Community industry during the IP, and in the three prior years. The indexed results are shown in the following table [70].
  • 2. The institutions shall make retrospective downward adjustments to remuneration in the event of a reduction as a result of the weightings shown in the Annex for the period between 1 January 2003 and the date of entry into force of this Regulation.
  • The institutions shall make retrospective downward adjustments to remuneration in the event of a reduction of remuneration as a result of the weightings shown in the Annex for the period between 1 July 2006 and the date of entry into force of this Regulation.
  • The institutions shall make retrospective downward adjustments to remuneration in the event of a reduction as a result of the weightings shown in the Annex for the period between 1 July 2008 and the date of entry into force of this Regulation.
  • The institutions shall make retrospective downward adjustments to remuneration in the event of a reduction as a result of the weightings shown in the Annex for the period between 1 July 2004 and the date of entry into force of this Regulation.

the results showed in

This phrase is correct but used in the past tense.

This phrase is used when referring to results that were displayed or presented in the past.
  • The results showed visible improvements in the group wearing the electromagnetic helmet.
  • The results showed that involving women in health care decision making has a positive effect.
  • The results showed no significant difference in the pharmacokinetics of bevacizumab in relation to age.
  • The results showed an improvement in lameness score in dogs with 7 Westferry Circus, Canary Wharf, London E14 4HB, UK Tel.
  • The results showed that, in principle, all the printing works could produce euro banknotes to the same standards.
  • The alarming result showed that one in five Muslim religious education teachers rejects democracy as incompatible with Islam!
  • The vardenafil results showed an increase in QTc (Fridericia) of 8 msec (90% CI:
  • The results showed that there were diminishing levels of chemotherapy drugs within Jim's blood.
  • The results showed a brain aneurysm.
  • The results showed that the active metabolite is formed from losartan in all age groups.
  • Analysis of the results showed that:
  • Tox results showed high levels of flunitrazepam.
  • Well, the results showed that hundreds of thousands of these life-bearing planets, statistically, at least...
  • The results showed that treatment with perindopril once daily resulted in a significant absolute reduction in the primary endpoint.
  • The results showed that this should not be the case, because rules about type proof acceptance were introduced recently.
  • I took the test and the result showed I was positive.
  • The results showed that exercise duration was 31 seconds longer in ranolazine patients versus placebo patients (p = 0.002).
  • The results showed roughly similar pharmacokinetic parameters of losartan following oral administration in infants and toddlers, preschool children, school age children and adolescents.
  • The results showed roughly similar pharmacokinetic parameters of losartan following oral administration in infants and toddlers, preschool children, school age children and adolescents.
  • The results showed that, despite the measures taken in the previous years, the area where PWN is present has enlarged considerably.

Related Comparisons

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9TextRanch on TrustPilot).

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!

×

💝 TextRanch Holidays Offer! 💝️

25% special discount
Stock up on credits for the entire year!

Grab this offer now!