TextRanch

The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

The result of two firms forming one company. vs the dog ate poo

These two phrases are not comparable as they are completely unrelated. The first phrase is a coherent sentence describing a business situation, while the second phrase is a random statement about a dog eating something. It doesn't make sense to compare them.

Last updated: March 11, 2024

The result of two firms forming one company.

This phrase is correct and commonly used in business contexts to describe the outcome of two firms merging to create a single company.

This phrase is used to explain the outcome of the process where two separate firms come together to establish a new entity.

the dog ate poo

This phrase is grammatically correct but not commonly used in formal or polite contexts due to its crude nature.

This phrase describes a situation where a dog consumed feces. It is more commonly expressed as 'the dog ate poop' in informal settings.

Alternatives:

  • the dog ate poop
  • the dog consumed feces
  • the dog ingested excrement
  • the dog devoured waste
  • the dog consumed waste material

Related Comparisons

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9TextRanch on TrustPilot).

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!