"the redundancy of" vs "both of them achieve"

Question

"the redundancy of" vs "both of them achieve"

These two phrases are not directly comparable as they serve different purposes. 'The redundancy of' is used to indicate the unnecessary repetition of something, while 'both of them achieve' is used to highlight the accomplishment of two specific entities. They are correct in their respective contexts.

Last Updated: March 17, 2024

This phrase is used to point out the unnecessary duplication or repetition of something, emphasizing the excessiveness of a particular element.

Examples:

The redundancy of his words made the speech less impactful.
I noticed the redundancy of information in the report.
She highlighted the redundancy of having two similar departments.
The redundancy of features in the software confused the users.
The redundancy of tasks in the process slowed down efficiency.

This phrase is used to emphasize that two particular entities have successfully reached a goal or accomplished something.

Examples:

Both of them achieve high scores in their exams.
I'm proud that both of them achieve their dreams.
It's impressive how both of them achieve such success at a young age.
Both of them achieve great results through hard work.
The team celebrates when both of them achieve their targets.

Answer 1

the redundancy of

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to indicate unnecessary repetition.

Answer 2

both of them achieve

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to highlight the accomplishment of two specific entities.

"the redundancy of" vs "both of them achieve"

the redundancy of

both of them achieve

Related Comparisons