the recommended level of 0.7. vs the recommended level of 0.6.

Both phrases are correct, but they refer to different recommended levels. The first one mentions a recommended level of 0.7, while the second one mentions a recommended level of 0.6. The choice between them depends on the specific context and the actual recommended level being referred to.

Last updated: March 17, 2024 • 709 views

the recommended level of 0.7.

This phrase is correct and can be used when referring to a recommended level of 0.7.

This phrase is used to specify a recommended level of 0.7 in a particular context.

Show examples from the web [+]

Jul 28, 2015 ... National survey data show that prevention of tooth decay can be maintained at the recommended level of 0.7 milligrams of fluoride per liter of ...
Mar 18, 2015 ... What should I do if the water from my well has fluoride levels that are higher than the recommended level of 0.7 mg/L? In some regions in the ...
Aug 17, 2015 ... ... gradual decline in tooth decay as fluoride content in water increases from very low levels to the recommended level of 0.7 milligrams per liter.
In 2011 the United States Department of Health and Human Services (USHHS) proposed that the recommended level of 0.7 to 1.2 milligrams of fluoride per litre ...

the recommended level of 0.6.

This phrase is correct and can be used when referring to a recommended level of 0.6.

This phrase is used to specify a recommended level of 0.6 in a particular context.

Show examples from the web [+]

Aug 12, 2015 ... The factor loadings of all items in this study exceeded the recommended level of 0.6 [32]. Composite reliability reflects the internal consistency ...
The factor loading for all items ranging from 0.764 to 0.993, exceeds the recommended level of 0.6 (Chin et al.,1997). Composite reliability values, which depict ...
The composite reliability (CR) statistics and the average variance extracted (AVE) of all the constructs were greater than the recommended level of 0.6 (ranging.
than the recommended level of 0.6 (Hair et al.,. 1998). The following criteria were used in extracting the factors: a factor with an eigenvalue greater than one and ...

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9).

"Thank you!"
Sachi Nakama July 2024
"I have literally been through chat, PI, claude, bard and bing and I got conflicting answers! Thank you! Human intelligence reigns!"
Retha July 2024
"Faster than AI"
CYNTHIA December 2023
"This was very helpful and I personally think this site is the best."
Kaden October 2023
"It was extremely thorough and very helpful!"
imperialelisa October 2023
"7 years without any disappointment. Always 100% satisfied. You guys are the best in the world at what you do. Thank you so much :)"
Zubair Alam October 2023
"In a world of text messages and online communication, this is great to have as a live tool. Thank you."
Selena October 2023
"Without textranch I would be stuck!"
宏祐 October 2023
"Accuracy and fast response. Personal comments from editor. Thank you."
Clh September 2023
"I wasn't aware of this service, it's fascinating and more reliable than standard IA tools available on the internet"
Arturo September 2023
"The fact that you can get reliable fast feedback on your texts."
Vinicius Antonio August 2023
"you guys are better than grammarly i'm being honest here"
ordinary July 2023
"OMG! This is really good than any other text correction tools I've used so far. Highly recommend this."
Vehan July 2023
"Very fast and accurate. thank you."
mojtaba July 2023
"I love this app because it's help to writing skills all of students ♥️"
Tarisini July 2023
"This was exactly the mistake I was looking for, the wording dind´t sound right at first. Better than grammarly!"
Ente July 2023
"The immediate help that I received was reassuring and very satisfactory. Thanks."
priiiyanshuu July 2023
"this helps A LOT for my studies."
kathnunez02 June 2023
"Woow!! I would never have expected such precision! Thank you soooo much!!"
Berta June 2023
"Real Time Editor and not AI. Many Thanks."
Priya June 2023
"The very first thing excites me about Textranch is how much your editors care."
sepideh June 2023
"The fact that texts are checked by human editors rather than by AI, etc. I appreciate this!"
Анна June 2023
"Feel welcome, immediate response, high quality feedback"
martin.roy June 2023
"This is the best app that I have ever seen"
Burulai May 2023

the recommended level of 0.7. vs the recommended level of 0.6.