1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

"the influence was recognized" vs "the influence was resulted"

The phrase 'the influence was recognized' is correct, while 'the influence was resulted' is incorrect. 'Recognized' is the appropriate term to indicate that someone or something has been acknowledged or identified, while 'resulted' is not commonly used in this context.

Last Updated: March 17, 2024

the influence was recognized

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

This phrase is used to indicate that the influence was acknowledged or identified by someone.

Examples:

  • The influence of her work was recognized by the committee.
  • His efforts in the project were recognized by his colleagues.
  • The positive influence of the campaign was recognized by the public.

Alternatives:

  • the influence was acknowledged
  • the influence was identified
  • the influence was appreciated
  • the influence was noticed
  • the influence was understood

the influence was resulted

This phrase is incorrect in English.

Related Comparisons

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!