TextRanch

The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

the funds are vs the funds is

The phrase 'the funds are' is correct, while 'the funds is' is incorrect. 'Funds' is a plural noun, so it should be paired with the plural verb 'are.'

Last updated: March 26, 2024 • 1735 views

the funds are

Correct. 'Funds' is a plural noun, so it should be paired with the plural verb 'are.'

Use 'the funds are' when referring to multiple funds. This construction follows subject-verb agreement rules in English.

Examples:

  • The funds are allocated for various projects.
  • The funds are insufficient for the task at hand.
  • The funds are managed by a team of experts.
  • The funds are being transferred to a different account.
  • The funds are available for withdrawal.
  • I appreciate that the funds are directed to the citizens in need.
  • In such circumstances, the funds are often temporarily invested pending their expenditure on the qualifying asset.
  • In my view, the European Commission and Parliament have sufficient control mechanisms at their disposal to ensure that the funds are spent effectively.
  • In particular, they must ensure that the funds are used in accordance with the principle of sound financial management.
  • The provisioning mechanism can work even if the funds are placed outside the financial framework.
  • In line with the DCI regulation the funds are exclusively spent in civilian sectors.
  • As you can see, the funds are on account and ready for me to put them to work.
  • As you can see, the funds are on accounts and ready for me to put them to work.
  • While in others, such as Spain, Finland and Sweden, the funds are managed by separate legal entities.
  • As the funds are administered by the Commission, Member State national parliaments do not participate in decisions over allocations.
  • We are critical of the system's current structure and scope, but how the funds are used is nevertheless important.
  • This is important, but in accounting everything balances out, while in real life the funds are squandered and spent inefficiently.
  • I do not think that that gives anyone grounds to conclude that the funds are poorly managed.
  • This must be done at industry and company level, not only regionally and locally, so that the funds are mobilised quickly to help the workers in crisis.
  • The problem is that the funds are being spent on staff and not on environmental projects.
  • If the funds are transparent and comply with clear rules of accountability then the fact that they are State-owned investment vehicles should not give cause for concern.
  • In future, we expect monitoring that ensures that the funds are employed in a way that is traceable and durable.
  • We must aspire to an exemplary optimisation of how the funds are handled and spent, based on simple and transparent rules founded on the principle of direct responsibility.
  • In order to ensure that the funds are used in accordance with the applicable rules,
  • Nevertheless, the Commission has a control over these local bank accounts by a double signature on the subsequent cash outflows, when the funds are mobilised for the operations specified in the FMO.

Alternatives:

  • The money is
  • The resources are
  • The assets are
  • The capital is
  • The budget is

the funds is

Incorrect. 'Funds' is a plural noun and should be paired with the plural verb 'are.'

  • evaluation: mechanisms are put in place both at EU level and for each of the individual programming instruments with a view to ensuring that implementation of the funds is properly monitored and assessed.
  • The Commission and the Member States shall ensure that assistance from the Funds is consistent with the activities, policies and priorities of the Community and complementary to other financial instruments of the Community.
  • My primary concern in regard to the funds is under-utilization.
  • Relaxing the deadlines for the use of the funds is a major step forward.
  • None of the funds is available on a long-term basis for the full range of activities associated with Natura 2000 management.
  • The actual use of the funds is directly related with the occurrence of disasters and of requests from Member States for additional transportation, i.e. difficult to predict.
  • The basic aim of the funds is to contribute to economic and social cohesion by supporting the less developed regions, in order to ensure effective equality of opportunities for all European citizens.
  • The payment of the funds is tied to the implementation of these measures, which is a welcome development.
  • The actual use of the funds is directly related with the occurrence of disasters and of requests from Member States for additional transportation, i.e. difficult to predict.
  • programming: operation of the funds is based on a multiannual programming process;
  • Securing the level of the funds is one thing, but the guarantee that we will now really have a say in the assessment that the millennium goals will be taken seriously is another.
  • One of the reasons is that a considerable proportion of the funds is administered under shared management, i.e. 80% of the EU's funds are managed by the Member States.
  • The priority of the funds is to improve the quality of the programmes, to link these with reducing regional asymmetries within the Union and to use them to improve the quality of life of the citizens.
  • Implementation of the Funds is managed by national or regional authorities in each Member State.
  • This column has to be completed where the contribution of the Funds is calculated with reference to public eligible expenditure.
  • 5. Where the contribution from the Funds is calculated with reference to public expenditure as provided for in Article 53(1), any information on expenditure other than public expenditure shall not affect the amount due as calculated on the basis of the payment request.
  • Where the contribution from the Funds is calculated with reference to public expenditure as provided for in Article 53(1), any information on expenditure other than public expenditure shall not affect the amount due as calculated on the basis of the payment request.
  • The use of the funds is truly a very important issue for the freedom of movement, but the new Members will be 'bled white' by giving away their best people to old Members that are far richer.
  • The traceability of the funds is to be improved.
  • However, accessing the funds is not an end in itself.

Related Comparisons

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9TextRanch on TrustPilot).

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!