The company had requested again vs The company requested again

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in slightly different contexts. "The company had requested again" is used when emphasizing the past action of requesting, while "the company requested again" is more straightforward and commonly used.

Last updated: March 30, 2024 • 1141 views

This phrase is correct and emphasizes the past action of requesting.

"The company had requested again"

This phrase is used when you want to emphasize that the company had made a request once more in the past.

Examples:

The company had requested again for an extension on the deadline.

Show examples from the web [+]

The company had requested a re-examination of the negative opinion, but this had not yet finished when the company withdrew.
The company had requested a re-examination of the negative opinion, but this had not yet finished when the company withdrew.
Pending the outcome of the proceedings the company had made appropriate provision for the liability in its accounts.
As the company had supplied the additional information requested, the' Exceptional Circumstances' ended on 7 January 1998.
As the company had supplied the additional information requested, the' Exceptional Circumstances' ended on 13 March 2001.
The company had thus been duly informed of the exchange rate to be used.
The company had 196 employees in 2009.
As the company had supplied the additional information requested, the' Exceptional Circumstances' ended on 25 August 2008.
Last year, my department handled a case Where the company had to pay out $2.5 billion.
The company had an acute liquidity need which it could not overcome by its own resources.
As the company had supplied the additional information requested, the' Exceptional Circumstances' ended on 10 March 2004.
This advantage had an impact on competition: the company had additional liquidity.
And then she convinced the new board of directors that the company had outgrown me.
In addition, the company had paid off all its debts with interest.
However from 1997 to 2003 the company had insufficient cash flow to finance this investment.
Thus the argument of the company had to be dismissed.
And all the companies had stolen technologies.
Thirdly, the company had unequivocally spoken out beforehand in favour of barrage weirs and canalisation.
For the Saint Petersburg training programme, the company had not received aid.
It appeared that, since 2005, the company had increased its global turnover and significantly improved its profitability.

Alternatives:

The company requested once more.

This phrase is correct and commonly used in everyday language.

"The company requested again"

This phrase is used to simply state that the company made a request once more.

Examples:

The company requested again for additional funding.

Show examples from the web [+]

Since no such excise duty is payable on export sales, the company requested the normal value to be adjusted accordingly.
Secondly, the company requested a mere deduction from the current MIP of amounts corresponding to the amount of the fixed anti-dumping duty.
On 24 August 2007, the Commission received a reasoned submission by TomTom in which the company requested a referral to the Commission pursuant to Article 4(5) of the Merger Regulation.
The entire amount of import duties foregone is taken as the numerator and not the excess remission/exemption, as the company requested, because the ALS does not fulfil the conditions laid down in Annex II to the basic Regulation.
Finally, as none of the companies requested MET, the Commission could not fully assess the reliability of the accounts which, inter alia, is crucial for establishing a relationship of trust on which undertakings are based.
Concerning the evidence collected from the national customs administration, which could not be disclosed to the Malaysian company for the reasons set out above, the company requested the Hearing Office to verify its accuracy.
Moreover, the exporting producer claimed that the current assessment of the criteria 2 and 3 contradicts the conclusion of the two previous investigations in which the company requested MET, and in which it was concluded that criteria 2 and 3 were met.
Three (groups of) companies requested individual examination.
Two other companies requested only IT.
One company requested that their claims were reconsidered.
Thirteen companies or groups of companies requested MET while one company requested only IT.
Before the Oral Hearing one company requested an in camera session.
Three companies requested formal admission to the proceedings as interested third parties.
Moreover, a minority of investment companies requested higher thresholds compared to other investors.
As set out in the provisional Regulation, one group of Chinese companies requested MET or, failing that, IT, while another group of Chinese companies requested IT only.
One Cambodian company requested the duties not be collected on imports of its products that were registered, for reasons of fairness.
As a result, one of these companies requested an individual duty independent from that of the other company.
As mentioned in recital 6 above, both of the cooperating Chinese groups of companies requested IT.
The same company requested that the Commission provides further details on the calculation of the constructed normal value of both cells and modules.
If a company requested a tax deferral in future, the Spanish authorities undertook to apply the general rules and not this measure.

Alternatives:

The company asked again.

How TextRanch works

Fast and reliable proofreading, editing, and language advice tailored to your needs.

1. Choose Your Service

Quick Text Editing

Emails and short texts
Proofreading & editing
Ready in 5-10 minutes

SUBMIT YOUR TEXT NOW

Document Editing

Documents of any type (*.docx)
Advanced & Premium editing
Ready in as little as 4 hours

UPLOAD YOUR DOCUMENT

Ask an Editor

Personalized answers to your language questions
Expert guidance on grammar, style, and usage
Ready in 24 hours

ASK YOUR QUESTION

Upload your document or paste your text directly into our platform. Your text is reviewed and refined by our expert editors (real people, not machines) who understand the nuances of English. Expect corrections, improvements, and insightful suggestions that enhance the clarity, tone, and professionalism of your writing.

3. Receive Your Polished Text

In just a few minutes (or hours for longer documents), you'll receive your corrected text. Review the changes, make any final adjustments, and confidently share your polished English with the world.
You can count on a personalized, friendly service every time you use TextRanch. We're committed to helping you make a great impression with every word you write.

We proofread and edit these types of texts and documents:

Short texts Business Emails Personal Emails Social media posts Resume and Curriculum Vitae Business documents Sales proposal Research and academic papers Thesis Dissertation Essays Articles Blog posts and much more....

Our Customers Love Us!

We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283125 votes, and

4.9 Excellent - Reviews 2.137

"7 years without any disappointment. Always 100% satisfied. You guys are the best in the world at what you do. Thank you so much :)"

Zubair
from Bangladesh

"I wasn't aware of this service, it's fascinating and more reliable than standard IA tools available on the internet"

Arturo
from Mexico

"In a world of text messages and online communication, this is great to have as a live tool. Thank you."

Selena
from USA

"Wow, it's just so excellent. I never would have believed I could have a sure and excellent English companion. Thanks, TextRanch."

Ifiok
from Nigeria

"This is my first time using TextRanch, and I like how the editors take time to correct my text. To everyone who has never used TextRanch before, I highly recommend trying it."

Wilson
from France

"It is an amazing source of feedback because, as a non-native speaker, I really need to have a reliable helper correct my text."

Susan
from Germany

The company had requested again vs The company requested again