TextRanch

The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

The book was an interesting read vs The book didn't do much for me

The two phrases are expressing different opinions about a book. 'The book was an interesting read' implies that the book was engaging and enjoyable, while 'the book didn't do much for me' suggests that the book did not leave a strong impression or was not particularly engaging. These phrases are not directly comparable as they convey opposite sentiments.

Last updated: March 12, 2024 • 590 views

The book was an interesting read

This phrase is correct and commonly used to express that a book was engaging or enjoyable to read.

This phrase is used to describe a book that was interesting, engaging, or enjoyable to read. It indicates a positive opinion about the book.

Examples:

  • I finished the book in one sitting; it was such an interesting read.
  • She recommended the novel to me, saying it was an interesting read.
  • The book was an interesting read, with unexpected plot twists.
  • I found the author's writing style to make the book an interesting read.
  • Despite its length, the book was an interesting read from start to finish.
  • “What if someone could get into your dreams? Possible? The book was an interesting read, the characters each had their own personalities. They were sort of a ...
  • Overall, the book was an interesting read. If you have a problem with graphic sex scenes, you need to watch out. There are only a few though. I find Auel's writing ...
  • The book was an interesting read in the beginning, pointing out useful ideas to ponder for changing the way customers are helped with product or service ...
  • The book was an interesting read, no question about it. And the material that went into it was certainly exhaustively researched. In fact, almost 'over- researched'.

The book didn't do much for me

This phrase is correct and commonly used to express that a book did not leave a strong impression or was not particularly engaging.

This phrase is used to convey a negative opinion about a book, indicating that it did not make a significant impact or was not engaging to the reader.

Examples:

  • I was excited to read the book, but it didn't do much for me.
  • The book didn't do much for me, so I couldn't finish it.
  • Despite the hype, the book didn't do much for me personally.
  • I had high expectations, but the book didn't do much for me in the end.
  • The book didn't do much for me, so I wouldn't recommend it to others.
  • In all, the book didn't do much for me. It is readable but not really funny as I don't find drunken exploits all that amusing. (I'm not saying this is limited to Delaney ...
  • In all, the book didn't do much for me. It is readable but not really funny as I don't find drunken exploits all that amusing. (I'm not saying this is limited to Delaney ...
  • but unfortunately aside from amusing me with the occasional one-liner the book didn't do much for me. At first, due to the vertigino The Crow Road by Iain Banks ...
  • Reading the book didn't do much for me except for REG. Now does that sound like a good study plan? Some people might be laughing at the ...

Related Comparisons

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9TextRanch on TrustPilot).

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!