🎁 A holiday package to celebrate the season! Click here and shop now!

TextRanch

The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

The article proposes the question vs The article questions

Both phrases are correct, but they have different meanings and usage. 'The article proposes the question' means that the article puts forward a question for consideration or discussion. On the other hand, 'The article questions' means that the article raises doubts or challenges something. They are not directly comparable as they convey different ideas.

Last updated: March 23, 2024 • 892 views

The article proposes the question

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English. It means that the article suggests a question for consideration or discussion.

This phrase is used when an article introduces a question for further exploration or analysis.

Examples:

  • The research paper proposes the question of whether technology is beneficial for education.
  • The novel proposes the question of what it means to be truly happy.
  • The documentary proposes the question of how climate change is affecting our planet.
  • The European Commission proposes the broadening of the (present) Article 69 for several purposes, including addressing the question of both disadvantages for farmers in specific sectors in certain regions and of top-up entitlements in restructuring areas.
  • The Article proposes that appropriate action is taken immediately in urgent situations, or in the case where a country refuses also says that such action shall, and I quote, 'be suspended as soon as the reason for its introduction no longer exists'.
  • The CoR questions the monitoring requirements in Article 39 and the terms of Articles 4 and 40 and proposes the amendment.
  • Article 62c proposes as a general rule that the Court of Justice is to give a ruling on the question or questions which are subject to review.
  • Comments on the articles Article 1 Amendment This article proposes to delete the current reference to the reduced period for the Governing Council of the ECB to take
  • The ACP countries participated in the Article 96 consultations leading to the introduction of these measures, and in addition the EU has raised the question of Zimbabwe in the UN Human Rights Commission.
  • The question is whether Article 77 of the FR might also apply to the Structural Funds in instances where the Article 31 'lex specialis' does not apply.
  • The authors of the article themselves rightly raise the question whether the advantage of abolishing the 1 and 2-cent coins outweighs the risk of price increases through the rounding of prices.
  • In application of that role, it should be added in the Article 12 of both proposals that the Commission should regularly propose the implementation of new technologies which represent the state of the art in this field and which will enhance data protection and security levels.
  • No 19 proposes the deletion of the article whereby, in the event of the insolvency of a participant in the system, the insolvency law applicable is that of the country where the system is located.
  • Finally, in Amendment No 72 to Article 15 we propose that the question of crosssubsidies between the reserved sector and the competition sector should be examined not by the national regulative body but by an independent auditor.
  • On the question of modifying the proposal's structure, with the cancellation of the articles defining the scope of the technical regulations, the reporter is doubtful of the advisability of such an amendment and feels that the character of the framework regulation would be undermined.
  • the question whether HMRC failed to comply with Article 221(3) 45 of the Code by failing to communicate the Article 204 customs debt within the time limit
  • In the applicant's view, in this case the position and reasoning adopted by the Commission makes the question of Community interest and the validity of the rejection decision intrinsically linked to the validity of the Article 9 decision which is contested by the applicant in Case T-148/10.
  • The question is based on information from the article Brussels pays for positive publicity on: (http://www.euobserver.com/index.phtml? aid=14700).
  • The Commission does not have a copy of the article to which the Honourable Member refers and so it is unable to reply in detail to the questions, which are based on information contained in that article.
  • For my Group, therefore, Article 7 was crucial to a resolution of the matter, in other words the article in which we are to return to the question of waste solidification.
  • Mr President, on the question of Sellafield and the contamination of the Irish Sea, I did not say that the article was edited, but completely excised, at the request, I believe of the nuclear industry, specifically British Nuclear Fuels Limited.
  • Amendment 1 proposes the necessary transitional provisions.
  • For this reason we explicitly propose the figure five.

Alternatives:

  • the article raises the question
  • the article poses the question
  • the article presents the question
  • the article introduces the question
  • the article suggests the question

The article questions

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English. It means that the article raises doubts or challenges something.

This phrase is used when an article expresses skepticism or challenges a particular idea, concept, or belief.

Examples:

  • The article questions the validity of the study's findings.
  • The editorial questions the government's decision to cut funding for public schools.
  • The report questions the effectiveness of current environmental policies.
  • This amendment serves merely to adapt the wording to the new structure of the articles in question.
  • The article in question sets out the spheres of cooperation and implementation methods in detail.
  • Whatever the case, the articles in question have not been modified.
  • Accordingly, your rapporteur is proposing amendments deleting the articles in question.
  • The initial drafts for the article in question contains penalties for asserting that the Armenian genocide actually took place.
  • Paragraph 1 of the Article in question provides that the Commission shall adopt a regulation on charges.
  • In publishing the article in question Mr Gargani was simply doing his job as a Member of Parliament and Chairman of the Legal Affairs Committee.
  • Although re-examining the articles in question has taken much longer than expected, the task is now under way.
  • This amendment is a consequence of the preceding one, which serves to delete paragraph 3 of the article in question.
  • Consequently, there are no plans to amend the article in question.
  • However, the Article in question expressly states that every (!) worker is entitled to paid annual (!) leave of at least four weeks.
  • Moreover, it appears that Mr Vanhecke issued and distributed a retraction of the article in question.
  • As stated by the article in question, this review was to take place no later than 31 December 2007.
  • It should be noted, however, that the article in question dates from April 2005 and that Fagor's financial situation deteriorated markedly thereafter.
  • The article in question, Article 6, allows a number of derogations from the requirement to list ingredients.
  • The Committee therefore considers that, in publishing the articles in question, Luigi de Magistris was acting in the performance of his duties as Member of the European Parliament.
  • In the case of the article in question, both the author and the person responsible for amending it were known and resident in Belgium.
  • The article in question actually deals with the coordination of the conditions for practising certain medical and allied professions in the Member States.
  • This means that it should generally be understood that the EESC endorses the articles in question to the extent that it does not state otherwise.
  • As the Commission points out, the type of duty paid movement covered by the Articles in question mainly involved private individuals or small traders, who do not have substantial financial resources or commercial infrastructure.

Alternatives:

  • the article challenges
  • the article doubts
  • the article queries
  • the article disputes
  • the article contests

Related Comparisons

report on the timing vs report the timing the article’s status vs the article status The project provides for the development vs The project provides the development issue the report on the spot vs issue the report in explain the reason why vs explain the reason The results from this question can be used to determine the optimal degrees of freedom necessary to build a computer-controlled representation of the classical guitar in the future and may contribute to the basic study of similar instruments vs the question

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9TextRanch on TrustPilot).

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!

×

💝 TextRanch Holidays Offer! 💝️

25% special discount
Stock up on credits for the entire year!

Grab this offer now!