tested positive for vs tested positive with

Both "tested positive for" and "tested positive with" are commonly used phrases, but they are used in different contexts. "Tested positive for" is used when specifying the specific condition or disease that the test results show, while "tested positive with" is used when referring to the agent or substance that caused the positive result.

Last updated: April 01, 2024 • 550 views

tested positive for

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

This phrase is used to indicate the specific condition or disease that the test results show. For example, "He tested positive for COVID-19."

Examples:

She tested positive for the flu.
The patient tested positive for drugs.
They tested positive for the virus.
He tested positive for antibodies.
The test results showed he tested positive for cancer.

Show examples from the web [+]

The congressman tested positive for the same strain of chlamydia as the victim.
One of them tested positive for meningitis.
You have tested positive for chlamydia.
Because you have tested positive for syphilis.
But she tested positive for pseudoephedrine.
I'm afraid you've tested positive for malignancy.
Patient tested positive for syphilis, right?
I'm afraid that you have tested positive for chlamydia, syphilis, gonorrhea, hepatitis, pancreatitis, trichomonitis, nongonococcal urethritis.
The belt tested positive for lead.
You tested positive for the risk factor genes.
Miss Queen tested positive for a narcotic called Vertigo.
Holbrook's blood tested positive for Rohypnol.
Mr Chambers tested positive for haemophilia A.
I tested positive for the BRCA1 mutation.
This patient tested positive for IgE.
Both bodies tested positive for large amounts of opiates.
You've tested positive for chlamydia.
Patient tested positive for herpetic encephalitis.
So, the Mylar strip definitely tested positive for thallium.
I just did a pregnancy test and I... tested positive for baby.

Alternatives:

was diagnosed with
had a positive result for
showed positive results for
confirmed positive for
was found to have

tested positive with

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

This phrase is used to indicate the agent or substance that caused the positive test result. For example, "The food tested positive with salmonella."

Examples:

The water sample tested positive with lead contamination.
The patient tested positive with a rare bacteria.
The product tested positive with high levels of mercury.
The soil sample tested positive with pesticides.
The blood test showed he tested positive with a specific virus.

Show examples from the web [+]

Her blood tested positive for hemadin with an inr of 4.0 That's slightly higher than clinical levels.
We have a coffee cup that tested positive for strychnine with your fingerprints on it.
About 42 per cent of THC positive drivers also tested positive for alcohol, with a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.05 percent.
A reference substance may be tested with a positive control group as a means of demonstrating that under the laboratory test conditions, the response of the tested species has not changed significantly.
The belt tested positive for lead.
You tested positive for the risk factor genes.
His choice was made when he tested positive.
Miss Queen tested positive for a narcotic called Vertigo.
Holbrook's blood tested positive for Rohypnol.
Mr Chambers tested positive for haemophilia A.
I tested positive for the BRCA1 mutation.
This patient tested positive for IgE.
Both bodies tested positive for large amounts of opiates.
You've tested positive for chlamydia.
Patient tested positive for herpetic encephalitis.
So, the Mylar strip definitely tested positive for thallium.
Because you have tested positive for syphilis.
I just did a pregnancy test and I... tested positive for baby.
Then he got the respiratory problem, and he tested positive for Epstein-Barr.
I tested positive for this Chemica Desin.

Alternatives:

was found to have
showed presence of
was detected with
was identified with
had a positive result with

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9).

"Thank you!"
Sachi Nakama July 2024
"I have literally been through chat, PI, claude, bard and bing and I got conflicting answers! Thank you! Human intelligence reigns!"
Retha July 2024
"Faster than AI"
CYNTHIA December 2023
"This was very helpful and I personally think this site is the best."
Kaden October 2023
"It was extremely thorough and very helpful!"
imperialelisa October 2023
"7 years without any disappointment. Always 100% satisfied. You guys are the best in the world at what you do. Thank you so much :)"
Zubair Alam October 2023
"In a world of text messages and online communication, this is great to have as a live tool. Thank you."
Selena October 2023
"Without textranch I would be stuck!"
宏祐 October 2023
"Accuracy and fast response. Personal comments from editor. Thank you."
Clh September 2023
"I wasn't aware of this service, it's fascinating and more reliable than standard IA tools available on the internet"
Arturo September 2023
"The fact that you can get reliable fast feedback on your texts."
Vinicius Antonio August 2023
"you guys are better than grammarly i'm being honest here"
ordinary July 2023
"OMG! This is really good than any other text correction tools I've used so far. Highly recommend this."
Vehan July 2023
"Very fast and accurate. thank you."
mojtaba July 2023
"I love this app because it's help to writing skills all of students ♥️"
Tarisini July 2023
"This was exactly the mistake I was looking for, the wording dind´t sound right at first. Better than grammarly!"
Ente July 2023
"The immediate help that I received was reassuring and very satisfactory. Thanks."
priiiyanshuu July 2023
"this helps A LOT for my studies."
kathnunez02 June 2023
"Woow!! I would never have expected such precision! Thank you soooo much!!"
Berta June 2023
"Real Time Editor and not AI. Many Thanks."
Priya June 2023
"The very first thing excites me about Textranch is how much your editors care."
sepideh June 2023
"The fact that texts are checked by human editors rather than by AI, etc. I appreciate this!"
Анна June 2023
"Feel welcome, immediate response, high quality feedback"
martin.roy June 2023
"This is the best app that I have ever seen"
Burulai May 2023

tested positive for vs tested positive with