tested positive for vs tested positive with

Both "tested positive for" and "tested positive with" are commonly used phrases, but they are used in different contexts. "Tested positive for" is used when specifying the specific condition or disease that the test results show, while "tested positive with" is used when referring to the agent or substance that caused the positive result.

Last updated: April 01, 2024 • 685 views

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

"tested positive for"

This phrase is used to indicate the specific condition or disease that the test results show. For example, "He tested positive for COVID-19."

Examples:

She tested positive for the flu.
The patient tested positive for drugs.
They tested positive for the virus.
He tested positive for antibodies.
The test results showed he tested positive for cancer.

Show examples from the web [+]

The congressman tested positive for the same strain of chlamydia as the victim.
One of them tested positive for meningitis.
You have tested positive for chlamydia.
Because you have tested positive for syphilis.
But she tested positive for pseudoephedrine.
I'm afraid you've tested positive for malignancy.
Patient tested positive for syphilis, right?
I'm afraid that you have tested positive for chlamydia, syphilis, gonorrhea, hepatitis, pancreatitis, trichomonitis, nongonococcal urethritis.
The belt tested positive for lead.
You tested positive for the risk factor genes.
Miss Queen tested positive for a narcotic called Vertigo.
Holbrook's blood tested positive for Rohypnol.
Mr Chambers tested positive for haemophilia A.
I tested positive for the BRCA1 mutation.
This patient tested positive for IgE.
Both bodies tested positive for large amounts of opiates.
You've tested positive for chlamydia.
Patient tested positive for herpetic encephalitis.
So, the Mylar strip definitely tested positive for thallium.
I just did a pregnancy test and I... tested positive for baby.

Alternatives:

was diagnosed with
had a positive result for
showed positive results for
confirmed positive for
was found to have

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

"tested positive with"

This phrase is used to indicate the agent or substance that caused the positive test result. For example, "The food tested positive with salmonella."

Examples:

The water sample tested positive with lead contamination.
The patient tested positive with a rare bacteria.
The product tested positive with high levels of mercury.
The soil sample tested positive with pesticides.
The blood test showed he tested positive with a specific virus.

Show examples from the web [+]

Her blood tested positive for hemadin with an inr of 4.0 That's slightly higher than clinical levels.
We have a coffee cup that tested positive for strychnine with your fingerprints on it.
About 42 per cent of THC positive drivers also tested positive for alcohol, with a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.05 percent.
A reference substance may be tested with a positive control group as a means of demonstrating that under the laboratory test conditions, the response of the tested species has not changed significantly.
The belt tested positive for lead.
You tested positive for the risk factor genes.
His choice was made when he tested positive.
Miss Queen tested positive for a narcotic called Vertigo.
Holbrook's blood tested positive for Rohypnol.
Mr Chambers tested positive for haemophilia A.
I tested positive for the BRCA1 mutation.
This patient tested positive for IgE.
Both bodies tested positive for large amounts of opiates.
You've tested positive for chlamydia.
Patient tested positive for herpetic encephalitis.
So, the Mylar strip definitely tested positive for thallium.
Because you have tested positive for syphilis.
I just did a pregnancy test and I... tested positive for baby.
Then he got the respiratory problem, and he tested positive for Epstein-Barr.
I tested positive for this Chemica Desin.

Alternatives:

was found to have
showed presence of
was detected with
was identified with
had a positive result with

How TextRanch works

Fast and reliable proofreading, editing, and language advice tailored to your needs.

1. Choose Your Service

Quick Text Editing

Emails and short texts
Proofreading & editing
Ready in 5-10 minutes

SUBMIT YOUR TEXT NOW

Document Editing

Documents of any type (*.docx)
Advanced & Premium editing
Ready in as little as 4 hours

UPLOAD YOUR DOCUMENT

Ask an Editor

Personalized answers to your language questions
Expert guidance on grammar, style, and usage
Ready in 24 hours

ASK YOUR QUESTION

Upload your document or paste your text directly into our platform. Your text is reviewed and refined by our expert editors (real people, not machines) who understand the nuances of English. Expect corrections, improvements, and insightful suggestions that enhance the clarity, tone, and professionalism of your writing.

3. Receive Your Polished Text

In just a few minutes (or hours for longer documents), you'll receive your corrected text. Review the changes, make any final adjustments, and confidently share your polished English with the world.
You can count on a personalized, friendly service every time you use TextRanch. We're committed to helping you make a great impression with every word you write.

We proofread and edit these types of texts and documents:

Short texts Business Emails Personal Emails Social media posts Resume and Curriculum Vitae Business documents Sales proposal Research and academic papers Thesis Dissertation Essays Articles Blog posts and much more....

Our Customers Love Us!

We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283125 votes, and

4.9 Excellent - Reviews 2.137

"7 years without any disappointment. Always 100% satisfied. You guys are the best in the world at what you do. Thank you so much :)"

Zubair
from Bangladesh

"I wasn't aware of this service, it's fascinating and more reliable than standard IA tools available on the internet"

Arturo
from Mexico

"In a world of text messages and online communication, this is great to have as a live tool. Thank you."

Selena
from USA

"Wow, it's just so excellent. I never would have believed I could have a sure and excellent English companion. Thanks, TextRanch."

Ifiok
from Nigeria

"This is my first time using TextRanch, and I like how the editors take time to correct my text. To everyone who has never used TextRanch before, I highly recommend trying it."

Wilson
from France

"It is an amazing source of feedback because, as a non-native speaker, I really need to have a reliable helper correct my text."

Susan
from Germany

tested positive for vs tested positive with