"subsequent to" vs "subsequent to my"

Question

"subsequent to" vs "subsequent to my"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Subsequent to' is a preposition that can be used to indicate something that happens after a particular event or time. 'Subsequent to my' is a phrase that includes a possessive pronoun ('my') and is used to specify the subject or object of the subsequent action.

Last Updated: March 19, 2024

The phrase 'subsequent to' is a preposition that can be used to show the order of events or actions. It is often followed by a noun or noun phrase.

Examples:

The report will be issued subsequent to the meeting.
The changes were made subsequent to the feedback received.

Alternatives:

following
after
in the wake of
in the aftermath of
in the aftermath

'Subsequent to my' is a phrase that includes a possessive pronoun ('my') and is used to specify the subject or object of the subsequent action. It is often followed by a noun or noun phrase.

Examples:

Subsequent to my arrival, we will start the meeting.
Subsequent to my approval, the project can proceed.

Alternatives:

following my
after my
in the wake of my
in the aftermath of my
in the aftermath of my

Answer 1

subsequent to

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to indicate something that happens after a particular event or time.

Answer 2

subsequent to my

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to specify the subject or object of the subsequent action.

"subsequent to" vs "subsequent to my"

subsequent to

subsequent to my

Related Comparisons