TextRanch

The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

sponsorship for vs sponsorship of

Both 'sponsorship for' and 'sponsorship of' are commonly used phrases in English, but they are used in slightly different contexts. 'Sponsorship for' is typically used when referring to the recipient or beneficiary of the sponsorship, while 'sponsorship of' is used when referring to the entity or organization providing the sponsorship.

Last updated: March 23, 2024 • 2085 views

sponsorship for

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

This phrase is used when referring to the recipient or beneficiary of the sponsorship. For example, 'The company provided sponsorship for the event.'

Examples:

  • They received sponsorship for their research project.
  • She secured sponsorship for the charity run.
  • The team is seeking sponsorship for their upcoming competition.
  • He is grateful for the sponsorship for his education.
  • The organization is looking for sponsorship for the concert.
  • sponsorship for participation of experts from a maximum of ten developing countries in the BTWC inter-sessional programme;
  • organisation of an international exercise on the UN Secretary-General investigation mechanism for alleged use of biological weapons, with sponsorship for experts' participation.
  • The laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to certain types of sponsorship for the benefit of tobacco products with cross-border effects give rise to an appreciable risk of distortion of the conditions of competition for this activity within the Internal Market.
  • The laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to certain types of sponsorship for the benefit of tobacco products with substantial cross-border effects may give rise to an appreciable risk of distortion of the conditions of competition for this activity within the Internal Market.
  • The laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to certain types of sponsorship for the benefit of tobacco products with cross-border effects give rise to an appreciable risk of distortion of the conditions of competition for this activity within the Internal Market.
  • Public/private cooperation and private sponsorship for the digitalisation of Europe's cultural heritage is an important element of the system as it now stands.
  • Actually, it's the deadline for securing sponsorship for the forthcoming Formula 1 season.
  • financing from the private sector and sponsorship for digitalisation and dissemination;
  • How do we know she's not here to lose the sponsorship for us
  • Emphasises the importance of patronage and sponsorship for new works and artistic events, and reiterates its request to the Member States to grant tax relief to patrons;
  • Here are those two remaining race cars, and on the plus side, it means there is lots of post-apocalyptic sponsorship for them to share.

Alternatives:

  • funding for
  • support for
  • financial backing for
  • aid for
  • assistance for

sponsorship of

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

This phrase is used when referring to the entity or organization providing the sponsorship. For example, 'The sponsorship of the event was provided by a local company.'

Examples:

  • The sponsorship of the team came from a major corporation.
  • We are grateful for the sponsorship of our organization.
  • The sponsorship of the concert was secured by a local business.
  • The company announced the sponsorship of the charity event.
  • The sponsorship of the project was crucial for its success.
  • Cases of free distribution have occurred in the context of the sponsorship of events having cross-border effects and should therefore be prohibited.
  • Free distribution of tobacco products in the context of the sponsorship of events with cross-border effects is to be prohibited.
  • The logic behind the present proposal is clear: all Member States have adopted national rules to regulate the advertising and sponsorship of tobacco products.
  • In response to this scourge, we should take the necessary steps, in particular by significantly reducing all forms of advertising or sponsorship of these products.
  • The Commission proposal is intended to replace European Parliament and Council Directive 98/43/EC on the advertising and sponsorship of tobacco products OJ L213, 30.7.1998, p.
  • "is hereby terminating our sponsorship of the Duluth Bulldogs."
  • Several studies have demonstrated very clearly the effects of this advertising and the sponsorship of certain sporting events in terms of young people starting to smoke earlier.
  • Cases of free distribution have occurred in the context of the sponsorship of events having cross-border effects and should therefore be prohibited.
  • As well as being broadcast on television, advertising aimed at children is carried on mobile phones and the Internet, and can take the form of sponsorship of sports or cultural events.
  • Producers and purveyors of alcoholic beverages are heavily involved in the sponsorship of sports clubs and cultural organisations and of the events in which they participate.
  • We should ban sponsorship of all activities, particularly sporting activities, by manufacturers of alcoholic drinks.
  • It is well known that the European Court of Justice has annulled the directive on advertising and sponsorship of tobacco products (COM(2001) 283 final) of 14 May 2001 because it overstepped Community competence.
  • The new proposal presented by the Commission goes as far as possible - given the legal framework set by the Court of Justice - i n restricting the advertising and sponsorship of tobacco products.
  • Other forms of advertising, such as indirect advertising, as well as the sponsorship of events or activities without cross-border effects, fall outside the scope of this Directive.
  • Advertising of tobacco products via radio and the sponsorship of radio programmes by tobacco companies would also be banned on the same lines as television advertising under the television without frontiers directive.
  • Other forms of advertising, such as indirect advertising, as well as the sponsorship of events or activities without cross-border effects, fall outside the scope of this Directive.
  • the social wellbeing in the region (through improved environmental and living conditions, sponsorship of local events),
  • on the proposal for a European Parliament and Council directive on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to the advertising and sponsorship of tobacco products
  • and Directive 2003/33/EC on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to the advertising and sponsorship of tobacco products OJ L 152, 20.6.2003, p.
  • Directive 2003/33/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 May 2003 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to the advertising and sponsorship of tobacco products (OJ L 152, 20.6.2003, p.

Alternatives:

  • funding of
  • support of
  • financial backing of
  • aid of
  • assistance of

Related Comparisons

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9TextRanch on TrustPilot).

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!