⚡ Black Friday Offer: Click here and shop now!

TextRanch

The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

significant increase in training costs vs significant increase in cost of education

Both phrases are correct, but they convey slightly different meanings. 'Significant increase in training costs' refers specifically to the costs associated with training, while 'significant increase in cost of education' refers to the overall cost of education. The choice between the two depends on the context and the specific aspect of cost being emphasized.

Last updated: March 22, 2024 • 693 views

significant increase in training costs

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

This phrase is used to indicate a notable rise in the expenses related to training programs or activities.

Examples:

  • The company experienced a significant increase in training costs due to the implementation of new software.
  • The university faced a significant increase in training costs as they expanded their online course offerings.

Alternatives:

  • substantial rise in training expenses
  • notable increase in training expenditures
  • considerable growth in training costs
  • marked escalation in training expenses
  • significant surge in training expenses

significant increase in cost of education

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

This phrase is used to highlight a significant rise in the overall expenses associated with education, including tuition, fees, and other related costs.

Examples:

  • There has been a significant increase in the cost of education over the past decade.
  • Families are struggling with the significant increase in the cost of education for their children.
  • The rise in fuel prices in recent months has produced a significant increase in costs across all sectors of productive activity.
  • This proposal will have a very limited impact on households. Although the costs of evaluation seem high it is unlikely that these costs will result in any significant increases in the cost which consumers pay for food.
  • This proposal will have a very limited impact on households. Although the costs of evaluation seem high it is unlikely that these costs will result in any significant increases in the cost which consumers pay for food.
  • Subject: Further increase in cost of Galileo
  • Two of its audits, carried out in 2002 on the organisation of an electronic documentation system, brought to light a significant increase in costs and time taken caused by insufficient monitoring of the project.
  • A recent independent study commissioned by the European Commission and published on 27 April 2005 did much to allay fears of a drive to relocate outside the EU and of a significant increase in the cost of European chemical products.
  • The PPE-DE Group is extremely concerned by the food shortage which affects numerous poor countries around the world, but also by the significant increase in the cost of the consumer's shopping basket in Europe.
  • This barrier to competition leads to prices being distorted upwards, with an increase in costs of between 18 % and 40 %.
  • Subject: Rapid increase in costs of electronic components after earthquake in Japan
  • Subject: Increase in cost of car and motorcycle insurance in Italy
  • Increase in costs of production of the Community industry
  • Regarding the increase in costs of other feed components, this was not supported by sufficient evidence and had therefore to be rejected.
  • An impact analysis shows that the companies would only have to bear an increase in costs of around 2,5 %.
  • First it was the need to recover increases in costs of production that during the same period increased by 14 % (see recital 106).
  • With an increase in costs of 40 % occurring over the period considered, the Union industry still managed, between 2006 and 2007, to increase its prices by more than its increase in costs.
  • Given the significant increase in prices on the Union market during the RIP, with no evidence of a parallel increase in costs, it is concluded that the Union industry has not suffered material injury within the meaning of Article 3(5).
  • Despite the increase in labour costs, the investigation showed that the Community industry made efforts to rationalise its production and reduce its costs of production in order to absorb the significant increase in raw material prices, as described above in recital 118.
  • With an increase in costs of 14 % occurring over the period considered, the Union industry managed to increase its prices by only 9 %.
  • This increase in costs of production is estimated to have a limited impact on large companies that sell branded drinks since those companies are very profitable.
  • In this regard the Commission considered that given the limited substitutability of SWR by other products, the Community industry should have been able to pass on increases in costs of raw materials.

Alternatives:

  • substantial rise in education expenses
  • notable increase in educational costs
  • considerable growth in cost of schooling
  • marked escalation in educational expenses
  • significant surge in education costs

Related Comparisons

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9TextRanch on TrustPilot).

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!

×

⚡️ Black Friday 2024 ⚡️

Stock up on credits for the entire year!

Grab this offer now!