"should be charge" vs "should to charge"

Question

"should be charge" vs "should to charge"

The correct phrase is "should be charged." The phrase "should to charge" is incorrect in English. The correct form uses the verb "be" followed by the past participle "charged."

Last Updated: March 30, 2024

Use this phrase when you want to indicate that someone or something should be subjected to a charge or fee.

Examples:

He should be charged for the extra services provided.
The customers should be charged a fair price for the products.
The company should be charged a penalty for the violation.
She should be charged with the crime.
The students should be charged a fee for the event.

Alternatives:

should be charged
ought to be charged
need to be charged
must be charged
have to be charged

The correct form is "should be charged." Use the verb "be" followed by the past participle "charged" to form the passive voice correctly.

Answer 1

should be charge

This phrase is correct in English.

Answer 2

should to charge

This phrase is incorrect in English.

"should be charge" vs "should to charge"

should be charge

should to charge

Related Comparisons