"should not hinder" vs "should not hinder communication"

Question

"should not hinder" vs "should not hinder communication"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Should not hinder' is a concise way to express the idea that something should not obstruct or impede a process or action. On the other hand, 'should not hinder communication' specifies the context in which the hindrance should not occur, making it more explicit.

Last Updated: March 21, 2024

This phrase is used to convey the idea that an action or process should not be obstructed or impeded.

Examples:

The new regulations should not hinder innovation.
His lack of experience did not hinder his progress.
The bad weather should not hinder our plans.
The construction work should not hinder traffic flow.
The technical issues should not hinder the project completion.

Alternatives:

should not impede
should not obstruct
should not hamper
should not block
should not prevent

This phrase is used when emphasizing that communication should not be obstructed or impeded.

Alternatives:

should not impede communication
should not obstruct communication
should not hamper communication
should not block communication
should not prevent communication

Answer 1

should not hinder

This phrase is correct and commonly used to indicate that something should not obstruct or impede a process or action.

Answer 2

should not hinder communication

This phrase is correct and specifies that something should not obstruct or impede the process of communication.

"should not hinder" vs "should not hinder communication"

should not hinder

should not hinder communication

Related Comparisons