"should be mentioned clearly" vs "should clearly be mentioned"

Question

"should be mentioned clearly" vs "should clearly be mentioned"

Both phrases are correct, but they have slightly different meanings. 'Should clearly be mentioned' emphasizes the need for something to be mentioned in a clear manner, while 'should be mentioned clearly' focuses on the clarity of the mentioning itself. The choice between them depends on the emphasis you want to give in your sentence.

Last Updated: March 20, 2024

This phrase is used to highlight the importance of mentioning something in a clear manner.

Examples:

The instructions should be mentioned clearly for everyone to understand.
The details should be mentioned clearly in the report.

Alternatives:

should be clearly mentioned
should be explicitly mentioned
should be clearly stated
should definitely be mentioned
should be mentioned explicitly

This phrase is used to emphasize the necessity of mentioning something in a clear manner.

Examples:

The rules should clearly be mentioned in the handbook.
The key points should clearly be mentioned in the presentation.

Alternatives:

should definitely be mentioned
should be clearly mentioned
should be mentioned explicitly
should be clearly stated
should be explicitly mentioned

Answer 1

should be mentioned clearly

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Answer 2

should clearly be mentioned

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

"should be mentioned clearly" vs "should clearly be mentioned"

should be mentioned clearly

should clearly be mentioned

Related Comparisons