"should be retired" vs "should be retired now"

Question

"should be retired" vs "should be retired now"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. "Should be retired" is a general statement indicating that something should be taken out of service or stopped being used. On the other hand, "should be retired now" adds a sense of urgency, emphasizing that the action of retiring something should happen immediately.

Last Updated: March 23, 2024

This phrase is used to express the opinion that something is no longer useful or effective and should be discontinued or replaced.

Examples:

The old machinery should be retired.
The outdated software should be retired.
The tradition should be retired.
The policy should be retired.
The worn-out equipment should be retired.

Alternatives:

should be replaced
should be discontinued
should be phased out
should be decommissioned
should be taken out of service

This phrase is used when there is a need to stress that the action of retiring something should happen without delay.

Examples:

The dangerous product should be retired now.
The malfunctioning machine should be retired now.
The expired medication should be retired now.
The leaking pipe should be retired now.
The unsafe playground equipment should be retired now.

Alternatives:

should be retired immediately
should be taken out of service now
should be discontinued now
should be replaced now
should be decommissioned now

Answer 1

should be retired

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to indicate that something should be taken out of service or stopped being used.

Answer 2

should be retired now

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to emphasize the urgency of retiring something immediately.

"should be retired" vs "should be retired now"

should be retired

should be retired now

Related Comparisons