"should be re-routed" vs "should be re-route"

Question

"should be re-routed" vs "should be re-route"

The correct phrase is 'should be re-routed.' 'Re-routed' is the past participle form of the verb 're-route,' which is used in passive constructions like this one. 'Re-route' is the base form of the verb and is not suitable for this context.

Last Updated: March 15, 2024

This phrase is the correct passive construction using the past participle form of the verb 're-route.' It is used when talking about changing the course or direction of something.

Examples:

The traffic should be re-routed to avoid the construction zone.
The package was re-routed to the correct address.
Flights were re-routed due to bad weather conditions.
The river was re-routed to prevent flooding.
The internet traffic was re-routed to improve speed.

The base form of the verb 're-route' is 're-route,' which is used in active constructions. In this passive construction, the correct form is 're-routed.'

Alternatives:

should re-route
needs to be re-routed
must be re-routed
will be re-routed
is being re-routed

Answer 1

should be re-routed

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Answer 2

should be re-route

This phrase is incorrect in this context.

"should be re-routed" vs "should be re-route"

should be re-routed

should be re-route

Related Comparisons