"Should be paid" vs "Should be paid for"

Question

"Should be paid" vs "Should be paid for"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Should be paid for' is used when referring to the recipient of the payment, while 'should be paid' is used when talking about the action of receiving payment. It's important to use the correct preposition 'for' when indicating the recipient of the payment.

Last Updated: March 30, 2024

This phrase is used when talking about the action of receiving payment. It does not specify the recipient of the payment.

Examples:

The invoice should be paid by the end of the month.
Workers should be paid on time.
The bill should be paid immediately.
Fees should be paid in advance.
Salaries should be paid monthly.

Alternatives:

should receive payment
should be compensated
should be remunerated
should be rewarded
should be reimbursed

This phrase is used when indicating who should receive the payment. It is important to include the preposition 'for' to specify the recipient.

Examples:

Employees should be paid for their hard work.
The services provided should be paid for by the client.
Students should be paid for their participation in the study.
Artists should be paid for their performances.
Volunteers should be paid for their time and effort.

Alternatives:

should receive payment for
should be compensated for
should be remunerated for
should be rewarded for
should be reimbursed for

Answer 1

Should be paid

This phrase is correct and commonly used when referring to the action of receiving payment.

Answer 2

Should be paid for

This phrase is correct and commonly used when referring to the recipient of the payment.

"Should be paid" vs "Should be paid for"

Should be paid

Should be paid for

Related Comparisons