"should be forwarded" vs "should be forwarded to us in hard copy"

Question

"should be forwarded" vs "should be forwarded to us in hard copy"

Both phrases are correct, but they convey slightly different meanings. The phrase 'should be forwarded to us in hard copy' specifies the format in which the item should be forwarded, while 'should be forwarded' is more general and does not specify the format. The choice between the two depends on whether specifying 'in hard copy' is necessary for the context.

Last Updated: March 15, 2024

This phrase is more general and does not specify the format in which the item should be forwarded. It can be used when the format is not crucial or when it is assumed to be understood.

Examples:

The report should be forwarded to the team by the end of the day.
All inquiries should be forwarded to the customer service department.

Alternatives:

should be sent
should be transferred
should be passed on
should be directed
should be relayed

This phrase is used when you want to specify that the item should be sent in a physical format, such as a printed document, rather than electronically. It is important when the format is crucial for the recipient.

Examples:

The signed contract should be forwarded to us in hard copy for our records.
All supporting documents must be forwarded to us in hard copy to complete the application process.

Alternatives:

should be forwarded to us physically
should be sent to us in hard copy
should be mailed to us in hard copy
should be provided to us in hard copy
should be delivered to us in hard copy

Answer 1

should be forwarded

This phrase is correct and commonly used when the format of forwarding is not specified.

Answer 2

should be forwarded to us in hard copy

This phrase is correct and commonly used when specifying the format in which something should be forwarded.

"should be forwarded" vs "should be forwarded to us in hard copy"

should be forwarded

should be forwarded to us in hard copy

Related Comparisons