"short compared to" vs "shorter compared to"

Question

"short compared to" vs "shorter compared to"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Short compared to' is used when comparing two things of different lengths, while 'shorter compared to' is used when comparing two things of different lengths and emphasizing the difference in length.

Last Updated: March 21, 2024

This phrase is used when comparing two things of different lengths. For example, 'The table is short compared to the chair.'

Examples:

The book is short compared to the encyclopedia.
The cat is short compared to the dog.
The road is short compared to the highway.
The tree is short compared to the skyscraper.
The river is short compared to the ocean.

Alternatives:

small compared to
narrow compared to
low compared to
brief compared to
concise compared to

This phrase is used when comparing two things of different lengths and emphasizing the difference in length. For example, 'The table is shorter compared to the chair.'

Examples:

The skirt is shorter compared to the dress.
The movie is shorter compared to the TV series.
The sprinter is shorter compared to the marathon runner.
The meeting is shorter compared to the conference.
The story is shorter compared to the novel.

Alternatives:

smaller compared to
narrower compared to
lower compared to
briefer compared to
more concise compared to

Answer 1

short compared to

This phrase is correct and commonly used when comparing two things of different lengths.

Answer 2

shorter compared to

This phrase is correct and commonly used when comparing two things of different lengths and emphasizing the difference in length.

"short compared to" vs "shorter compared to"

short compared to

shorter compared to

Related Comparisons