TextRanch

The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Scores were not autopopulated vs Scores were not auto-populated

Both phrases are correct, but the second one is more commonly used in English. The hyphenated form 'auto-populated' is preferred when using 'auto' as a prefix to a word like 'populated'.

Last updated: March 27, 2024 • 631 views

Scores were not autopopulated

This phrase is correct but less common in English.

This phrase means that the scores were not automatically filled in or completed.

Show examples from the web [+]

Scores were slaughtered in the raid against Arminius.
Your practice test scores were great.
Baseline spinal and femoral neck bone mineral density mean T-scores were -2.2 and -2.1, respectively.
Scores were around 23 points at the start of the study.
So your mom tells me that your S.A.T. scores were off the charts.
Your scores were beginning to improve.
I don't care how high your IQ test scores were.
When the CIA recruited you, your test scores were good.
No differences in the median fibrosis score were seen between groups using the Knodell fibrosis score.
Mean baseline NAPSI scores were 4.6 and 4.3 in infliximab and placebo group.
The Hynix scores were 700 % higher than the threshold level of a company in severe financial distress(5).
One young woman had great grades, but test scores were not as high.
The kid's I.Q. Scores were off the charts, yet he was failing all his classes... bored, obviously.
Minnelli's scores were always by the best.
Similar reductions in redness scores were seen, falling from 4.5 to 3.7 after five minutes and 2.7 after two hours.
You forgot to ask me how the test scores were.
What was it you said my scores were earlier?
Although Jules' grades were top-notch and her test scores were excellent, there were a record number of applications this year.
You said that that my aptitude scores were good enough To get any apprenticeship that i wanted.
She still studies when her scores were perfect on exams?

Alternatives:

scores were not auto-populated
scores were not automatically populated

Scores were not auto-populated

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

This phrase means that the scores were not automatically filled in or completed.

Show examples from the web [+]

Scores were slaughtered in the raid against Arminius.
Your practice test scores were great.
Baseline spinal and femoral neck bone mineral density mean T-scores were -2.2 and -2.1, respectively.
Scores were around 23 points at the start of the study.
So your mom tells me that your S.A.T. scores were off the charts.
Your scores were beginning to improve.
I don't care how high your IQ test scores were.
When the CIA recruited you, your test scores were good.
No differences in the median fibrosis score were seen between groups using the Knodell fibrosis score.
Mean baseline NAPSI scores were 4.6 and 4.3 in infliximab and placebo group.
The Hynix scores were 700 % higher than the threshold level of a company in severe financial distress(5).
One young woman had great grades, but test scores were not as high.
The kid's I.Q. Scores were off the charts, yet he was failing all his classes... bored, obviously.
Minnelli's scores were always by the best.
Similar reductions in redness scores were seen, falling from 4.5 to 3.7 after five minutes and 2.7 after two hours.
You forgot to ask me how the test scores were.
What was it you said my scores were earlier?
Although Jules' grades were top-notch and her test scores were excellent, there were a record number of applications this year.
You said that that my aptitude scores were good enough To get any apprenticeship that i wanted.
She still studies when her scores were perfect on exams?

Alternatives:

scores were not autopopulated
scores were not automatically populated

Related Comparisons

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9).

"Thank you!"
Sachi Nakama July 2024
"I have literally been through chat, PI, claude, bard and bing and I got conflicting answers! Thank you! Human intelligence reigns!"
Retha July 2024
"Faster than AI"
CYNTHIA December 2023
"This was very helpful and I personally think this site is the best."
Kaden October 2023
"It was extremely thorough and very helpful!"
imperialelisa October 2023
"7 years without any disappointment. Always 100% satisfied. You guys are the best in the world at what you do. Thank you so much :)"
Zubair Alam October 2023
"In a world of text messages and online communication, this is great to have as a live tool. Thank you."
Selena October 2023
"Without textranch I would be stuck!"
宏祐 October 2023
"Accuracy and fast response. Personal comments from editor. Thank you."
Clh September 2023
"I wasn't aware of this service, it's fascinating and more reliable than standard IA tools available on the internet"
Arturo September 2023
"The fact that you can get reliable fast feedback on your texts."
Vinicius Antonio August 2023
"you guys are better than grammarly i'm being honest here"
ordinary July 2023
"OMG! This is really good than any other text correction tools I've used so far. Highly recommend this."
Vehan July 2023
"Very fast and accurate. thank you."
mojtaba July 2023
"I love this app because it's help to writing skills all of students ♥️"
Tarisini July 2023
"This was exactly the mistake I was looking for, the wording dind´t sound right at first. Better than grammarly!"
Ente July 2023
"The immediate help that I received was reassuring and very satisfactory. Thanks."
priiiyanshuu July 2023
"this helps A LOT for my studies."
kathnunez02 June 2023
"Woow!! I would never have expected such precision! Thank you soooo much!!"
Berta June 2023
"Real Time Editor and not AI. Many Thanks."
Priya June 2023
"The very first thing excites me about Textranch is how much your editors care."
sepideh June 2023
"The fact that texts are checked by human editors rather than by AI, etc. I appreciate this!"
Анна June 2023
"Feel welcome, immediate response, high quality feedback"
martin.roy June 2023
"This is the best app that I have ever seen"
Burulai May 2023

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!