"saves the cost" vs "saves the cost of"

Question

"saves the cost" vs "saves the cost of"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Saves the cost' is used when referring to the action of saving money in general, while 'saves the cost of' is used when specifying what is being saved. It doesn't make sense to directly compare them as they serve different purposes.

Last Updated: March 19, 2024

This phrase is used to indicate the act of saving money without specifying what is being saved.

Examples:

Investing in energy-efficient appliances saves the cost in the long run.
Using public transportation saves the cost of owning a car.
Repairing items instead of replacing them saves the cost in the long term.

Alternatives:

saves money
reduces expenses
cuts costs
minimizes spending
avoids unnecessary expenses

This phrase is used when you want to specify what cost is being saved or avoided.

Examples:

Using coupons saves the cost of groceries.
Repairing the roof saves the cost of a full replacement.
Investing in preventive maintenance saves the cost of major repairs.

Alternatives:

saves on the cost of
avoids the cost of
reduces the expense of
cuts the cost of
minimizes the spending on

Answer 1

saves the cost

This phrase is correct when referring to the action of saving money in general.

Answer 2

saves the cost of

This phrase is correct when specifying what is being saved.

"saves the cost" vs "saves the cost of"

saves the cost

saves the cost of

Related Comparisons