TextRanch
The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

TextRanch Editors

sampling error vs sampling errors

Both 'sampling error' and 'sampling errors' are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Sampling error' is used to refer to the error that occurs when the sample taken from a population is not representative of the whole population. On the other hand, 'sampling errors' can be used when discussing multiple errors related to the sampling process.

Last updated: March 30, 2024 • 553 views

This phrase is correct and commonly used in statistics to refer to the error that occurs when the sample taken from a population is not representative of the whole population.

"sampling error"

Use 'sampling error' when referring to the error that arises when the sample taken from a population does not accurately represent the entire population.

Examples:

  • The survey results had a sampling error of plus or minus 3%.
  • It's important to consider the sampling error when interpreting the study's findings.
  • NCBs that choose a sampling approach for the selection of the reporting agents provide an estimate of the sampling error for the initial sample.
  • Each NCB that chooses the sampling approach shall identify at least one stratification criterion to ensure that the sample of credit institutions and other institutions is representative of the participating Member State and the sampling error small.
  • If the coefficient of variation cannot be calculated, the estimated sampling error in terms of the absolute number of vacant posts shall be provided instead.
  • Non-sampling errors are basically of four types:
  • 3. Sampling errors together with any mistakes discovered in reporting as referred to in Article 3 shall be notified before 1 October of the year following the survey year.
  • Member State shall indicate with 'Y' (yes) or 'N' (no) whether sampling errors and non-sampling errors are measured and systematically documented, according to the European standards.
  • "Non-sampling errors" are errors that occur in all phases of the data collection and production process
  • 'Reliability' shall be assessed according to 'precision' which refers to the scale of sampling errors and 'representativity' which refers to the lack of bias.
  • 2. For each of the Member States, sampling errors for the results of the surveys provided for in Article 2 (2) shall not exceed 2 % (confidence interval of 68 %) of the total number of pigs.
  • "Sampling errors" refers to the variability that occurs at random because of the use of a sample rather than a census
  • In the case of livestock surveys, the sampling errors for the results of each Member State shall not exceed (with a confidence interval of 68 %):
  • Particular emphasis shall be given to models for the correction of non-sampling errors such as coverage of units of all requested size classes or NACE sections, imputation or grossing-up to correct for unit non-response.
  • a detailed description of the survey methodology: sampling methods, sampling errors and confidence intervals, sample size and estimated response rate,
  • sampling errors: these typically refer to errors resulting from the fact that a sample of units was observed rather than the entire set of units under study.
  • Court sampling reveals substantial errors that we are of course concerned to reduce to a minimum.
  • For the first wave of the EU-SILC longitudinal component, the information on sampling frame and coverage errors as defined in Annex II, point 2.3.1, of the present Regulation will be provided.
  • Sampling frame and coverage errors
  • Error in survey estimates which cannot be attributed to sampling fluctuations.
  • A projected error rate is calculated also in case of non-statistical sampling.
  • "Coverage errors" are errors due to differences between the target population and the sampling frame.

Alternatives:

  • margin of error
  • standard error
  • measurement error
  • statistical error
  • sampling variability

This phrase is also correct and can be used when discussing multiple errors related to the sampling process.

"sampling errors"

Use 'sampling errors' when referring to more than one error that occurred during the sampling process.

Examples:

  • The research team identified several sampling errors in their data collection methods.
  • Sampling errors can significantly impact the accuracy of study results.
  • 'Reliability' shall be assessed according to 'precision' which refers to the scale of sampling errors and 'representativity' which refers to the lack of bias.
  • In the case of livestock surveys, the sampling errors for the results of each Member State shall not exceed (with a confidence interval of 68 %):
  • a detailed description of the survey methodology: sampling methods, sampling errors and confidence intervals, sample size and estimated response rate,
  • sampling errors: these typically refer to errors resulting from the fact that a sample of units was observed rather than the entire set of units under study.
  • "Sampling errors" refers to the variability that occurs at random because of the use of a sample rather than a census
  • 2. For each of the Member States, sampling errors for the results of the surveys provided for in Article 2 (2) shall not exceed 2 % (confidence interval of 68 %) of the total number of pigs.
  • Member State shall indicate with 'Y' (yes) or 'N' (no) whether sampling errors and non-sampling errors are measured and systematically documented, according to the European standards.
  • 3. Sampling errors together with any mistakes discovered in reporting as referred to in Article 3 shall be notified before 1 October of the year following the survey year.

Alternatives:

  • errors in sampling
  • sampling mistakes
  • sampling inaccuracies
  • sampling discrepancies
  • sampling flaws

Related Comparisons

How TextRanch works

Fast and reliable proofreading, editing, and language advice tailored to your needs.

1. Choose Your Service

Quick Text Editing

  • Emails and short texts
  • Proofreading & editing
  • Ready in 5-10 minutes
SUBMIT YOUR TEXT NOW

Document Editing

  • Documents of any type (*.docx)
  • Advanced & Premium editing
  • Ready in as little as 4 hours
UPLOAD YOUR DOCUMENT

Ask an Editor

  • Personalized answers to your language questions
  • Expert guidance on grammar, style, and usage
  • Ready in 24 hours
ASK YOUR QUESTION

Upload your document or paste your text directly into our platform. Your text is reviewed and refined by our expert editors (real people, not machines) who understand the nuances of English. Expect corrections, improvements, and insightful suggestions that enhance the clarity, tone, and professionalism of your writing.

In just a few minutes (or hours for longer documents), you'll receive your corrected text. Review the changes, make any final adjustments, and confidently share your polished English with the world.
You can count on a personalized, friendly service every time you use TextRanch. We're committed to helping you make a great impression with every word you write.

We proofread and edit these types of texts and documents:

Short texts Business Emails Personal Emails Social media posts Resume and Curriculum Vitae Business documents Sales proposal Research and academic papers Thesis Dissertation Essays Articles Blog posts and much more....

Powered By Humans

TextRanch Editors

AI is a great tool, but when it comes to perfecting your writing, we rely on real human editors.

  • All our editors are native English speakers.
  • Each editor has passed a rigorous admission test to ensure quality.
  • Our global team is ready to correct any text, anytime.

MEET OUR EDITORS

TextRanch Editors

Why choose TextRanch?

Complete Privacy

Your texts are safe and secure with us. We never share your information with third parties.

Affordable Pricing

No subscription fees and rates up to 50% cheaper than other online editing services.

100% Satisfaction

We guarantee that you'll be satisfied with the quality of our service or your money back.

Top Customer Service

Our team is here to help you with any questions you may have. Contact us anytime.

Our Customers Love Us!

We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283125 votes, and

People Feedback 4.9 Excellent - Reviews 2.137

"7 years without any disappointment. Always 100% satisfied. You guys are the best in the world at what you do. Thank you so much :)"

Profile picture of Zubair from Bangladesh

Zubair
from Bangladesh From

"I wasn't aware of this service, it's fascinating and more reliable than standard IA tools available on the internet"

Profile picture of Arturo from Mexico

Arturo
from Mexico From

"In a world of text messages and online communication, this is great to have as a live tool. Thank you."

Profile picture of Selena from USA

Selena
from USA From

"Wow, it's just so excellent. I never would have believed I could have a sure and excellent English companion. Thanks, TextRanch."

Profile picture of Ifiok from Nigeria

Ifiok
from Nigeria From

"This is my first time using TextRanch, and I like how the editors take time to correct my text. To everyone who has never used TextRanch before, I highly recommend trying it."

Profile picture of Wilson from France

Wilson
from France From

"It is an amazing source of feedback because, as a non-native speaker, I really need to have a reliable helper correct my text."

Profile picture of Susan from Germany

Susan
from Germany From

Trusted by Hundreds Teams

Facebook logo
Accenture logo
Air Asia logo
AirBus logo
Amazon logo
Bayer logo
Decathlon logo
Docusign logo
Ebay logo
Fiverr logo
Fossil logo
Keller Williams logo
LinkedIn logo
Loreal logo
Motorola logo
Orange logo
Roche logo
Salesforce logo
Stellantis logo