"right to" vs "eligible to"

Question

"right to" vs "eligible to"

Both "right to" and "eligible to" are correct phrases, but they are used in different contexts. "Right to" is used to indicate a legal or moral entitlement, while "eligible to" is used to show that someone meets the necessary conditions to do something. They are not interchangeable as they convey different meanings.

Last Updated: March 24, 2024

This phrase is used to express a person's entitlement or permission to do something based on law, rules, or principles.

Examples:

Everyone has the right to freedom of speech.
Citizens have the right to vote in elections.
Employees have the right to fair treatment in the workplace.

Alternatives:

entitled to
permission to
freedom to
privilege to
authority to

This phrase is used to show that someone is qualified or has met the requirements to participate in or receive something.

Examples:

Students who meet the criteria are eligible to apply for the scholarship.
To be eligible to vote, you must be a citizen of the country.
Employees are eligible to receive health benefits after three months of employment.

Alternatives:

qualified to
meet the requirements to
entitled to
allowed to
permitted to

Answer 1

right to

The phrase "right to" is correct and commonly used in English to indicate a legal or moral entitlement.

Answer 2

eligible to

The phrase "eligible to" is correct and commonly used in English to indicate that someone meets the necessary conditions to do something.

"right to" vs "eligible to"

right to

eligible to

Related Comparisons